Literature DB >> 1639669

Visual attention and evoked otoacoustic emissions: a slight but real effect.

C Meric1, L Collet.   

Abstract

The effect of auditory or visual attention tasks on the peripheral auditory system, studied by Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials (BAEPs), electrocochleography or Evoked Oto-Acoustic Emissions (EOAEs), has been a subject of controversy. To investigate the divergences in findings, a study using EOAE and visual and auditory attention was run on 12 subjects. A significant effect during visual attention was obtained. A general diminution of EOAEs of 0.35 dB (equivalent reduction) was found. This result seems to prove that BAEPs are not the best technique to reveal the effect of attention on cochlear mechanisms, because of the weakness of the effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1639669     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(92)90061-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  12 in total

1.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of cross-modal selective attention on the sensory periphery: cochlear sensitivity is altered by selective attention.

Authors:  S Srinivasan; A Keil; K Stratis; K L Woodruff Carr; D W Smith
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. I: auditory attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Interaural attention modulates outer hair cell function.

Authors:  Sridhar Srinivasan; Andreas Keil; Kyle Stratis; Aaron F Osborne; Colin Cerwonka; Jennifer Wong; Brenda L Rieger; Valerie Polcz; David W Smith
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Cochlear activity in silent cue-target intervals shows a theta-rhythmic pattern and is correlated to attentional alpha and theta modulations.

Authors:  Moritz Herbert Albrecht Köhler; Gianpaolo Demarchi; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Cognitive task demands modulate the sensitivity of the human cochlea.

Authors:  David W Smith; Rony K Aouad; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-13

8.  Individual differences in distractibility: An update and a model.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-10

9.  Heightened visual attention does not affect inner ear function as measured by otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Rafal Milner; Lukasz Olszewski; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation.

Authors:  David W Smith; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.