Elizabeth Mawle1, Peter Griffiths. 1. Health Visitor, Westminster Primary Care Trust, 158 Herne Hill Road, London SE24 0AH, UK. elizabeth.mawle@westminster-pct.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To review the accuracy of brief screening tools for autism in pre-school children. DESIGN: Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Psychlit plus references of identified papers and contact with authors. SUBJECTS: Children and infants aged 5 years or less without a prior diagnosis of autism or pervasive development delay. INTERVENTIONS: Tools/checklists appropriate for use in screening for autism in primary care settings. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of screening tools and likelihood ratios relative to a diagnostic assessment made using either DSM-III/IV or ICD 10 diagnosis. RESULTS: Three studies considering two tools were identified. The CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers (CHAT) was tested on an appropriate population sample with moderate long-term follow-up but demonstrated poor sensitivity and positive predictive value. Weaker evidence suggested that the Modified CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) had high sensitivity but follow-up was of shorter term and less comprehensive. CONCLUSIONS: The CHAT demonstrated a level of sensitivity unlikely to be useful for population screening purposes, however, its high specificity suggests it has utility in secondary screening. The M-CHAT is a parent only report and might be more sensitive, and therefore appropriate for population screening. However, full conclusions regarding its accuracy cannot be drawn until follow-up data has been collected.
OBJECTIVES: To review the accuracy of brief screening tools for autism in pre-school children. DESIGN: Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Psychlit plus references of identified papers and contact with authors. SUBJECTS:Children and infants aged 5 years or less without a prior diagnosis of autism or pervasive development delay. INTERVENTIONS: Tools/checklists appropriate for use in screening for autism in primary care settings. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of screening tools and likelihood ratios relative to a diagnostic assessment made using either DSM-III/IV or ICD 10 diagnosis. RESULTS: Three studies considering two tools were identified. The CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers (CHAT) was tested on an appropriate population sample with moderate long-term follow-up but demonstrated poor sensitivity and positive predictive value. Weaker evidence suggested that the Modified CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) had high sensitivity but follow-up was of shorter term and less comprehensive. CONCLUSIONS: The CHAT demonstrated a level of sensitivity unlikely to be useful for population screening purposes, however, its high specificity suggests it has utility in secondary screening. The M-CHAT is a parent only report and might be more sensitive, and therefore appropriate for population screening. However, full conclusions regarding its accuracy cannot be drawn until follow-up data has been collected.
Authors: Ricardo Canal-Bedia; Patricia García-Primo; María Victoria Martín-Cilleros; José Santos-Borbujo; Zoila Guisuraga-Fernández; Lorena Herráez-García; María del Mar Herráez-García; Leticia Boada-Muñoz; Joaquín Fuentes-Biggi; Manuel Posada-de la Paz Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2011-10
Authors: Jamie M Kleinman; Diana L Robins; Pamela E Ventola; Juhi Pandey; Hilary C Boorstein; Emma L Esser; Leandra B Wilson; Michael A Rosenthal; Saasha Sutera; Alyssa D Verbalis; Marianne Barton; Sarah Hodgson; James Green; Thyde Dumont-Mathieu; Fred Volkmar; Katarzyna Chawarska; Ami Klin; Deborah Fein Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2008-05
Authors: Carrie Allison; Simon Baron-Cohen; Sally Wheelwright; Tony Charman; Jennifer Richler; Greg Pasco; Carol Brayne Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2008-02-01