Literature DB >> 16385646

Brainport: an alternative input to the brain.

Yuri Danilov1, Mitchell Tyler.   

Abstract

Brain Computer Interface (BCI) technology is one of the most rapidly developing areas of modern science; it has created numerous significant crossroads between Neuroscience and Computer Science. The goal of BCI technology is to provide a direct link between the human brain and a computerized environment. The objective of recent BCI approaches and applications have been designed to provide the information flow from the brain to the computerized periphery. The opposite or alternative direction of the flow of information (computer to brain interface, or CBI) remains almost undeveloped. The BrainPort is a CBI that offers a complementary technology designed to support a direct link from a computerized environment to the human brain - and to do so non-invasively. Currently, BrainPort research is pursuing two primary goals. One is the delivery of missing sensory information critical for normal human behavior through an additional artificial sensory channel around the damaged or malfunctioning natural sensory system. The other is to decrease the risk of sensory overload in human-machine interactions by providing a parallel and supplemental channel for information flow to the brain. In contrast, conventional CBI strategies (e.g., Virtual Reality), are usually designed to provide additional or substitution information through pre-existing sensory channels, and unintentionally aggravate the brain overload problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16385646     DOI: 10.1142/s0219635205000914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Integr Neurosci        ISSN: 0219-6352            Impact factor:   2.117


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Vertigo and falls in the elderly: Part 2: Fall diagnostics, prophylaxis and therapy].

Authors:  L E Walther; T Nikolaus; H Schaaf; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Eye position affects the perceived location of touch.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A standardized obstacle course for assessment of visual function in ultra low vision and artificial vision.

Authors:  Amy Catherine Nau; Christine Pintar; Christopher Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; KwonHo Jeong
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Augmenting sensorimotor control using "goal-aware" vibrotactile stimulation during reaching and manipulation behaviors.

Authors:  Emmanouil Tzorakoleftherakis; Todd D Murphey; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Sarah Blackstone; Cathy Bodine; John Brabyn; David Brienza; Kevin Caves; Frank DeRuyter; Edmund Durfee; Stefania Fatone; Geoff Fernie; Steven Gard; Patricia Karg; Todd A Kuiken; Gerald F Harris; Mike Jones; Yue Li; Jordana Maisel; Michael McCue; Michelle A Meade; Helena Mitchell; Tracy L Mitzner; James L Patton; Philip S Requejo; James H Rimmer; Wendy A Rogers; W Zev Rymer; Jon A Sanford; Lawrence Schneider; Levin Sliker; Stephen Sprigle; Aaron Steinfeld; Edward Steinfeld; Gregg Vanderheiden; Carolee Winstein; Li-Qun Zhang; Thomas Corfman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Non-linearity of Skin Properties in Electrotactile Applications: Identification and Mitigation.

Authors:  Mehdi Rahimi; Fang Jiang; Yantao Shen
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Vestibular rehabilitation with electrotactile vestibular substitution: early effects.

Authors:  Alev Uneri; Senol Polat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Altered connectivity of the balance processing network after tongue stimulation in balance-impaired individuals.

Authors:  Joe C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013

Review 9.  Synesthesia in science and technology: more than making the unseen visible.

Authors:  Kenneth S Suslick
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Clinical Tests of Ultra-Low Vision Used to Evaluate Rudimentary Visual Perceptions Enabled by the BrainPort Vision Device.

Authors:  Amy Nau; Michael Bach; Christopher Fisher
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.