OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the World Health Organization's rapid assessment and response (RAR) method of assessing injection drug use and its associated health problems, focusing on knowledge gain, capacity building, and whether RAR leads to the development of interventions reducing the health effects of injection drug use. METHODS: Data were derived from RAR studies conducted in Beijing, China; Bogotá, Colombia; Greater Rosario, Argentina; Hanoi, Vietnam; Kharkiv, Ukraine; Minsk, Belarus; Nairobi, Kenya; Penang, Malaysia; St. Petersburg, Russia; and Tehran, Iran. RESULTS: Substantial gains in knowledge and response capacity were reported at all of the study sites. Before RAR initiation, prevention and intervention programs had been absent or inadequate at most of the sites. The RARs resulted in many new or modified interventions; 7 sites reported 24 health-related interventions that were subsequently developed and influenced by the RARs. CONCLUSIONS: RARs, which require relatively little external funding, appear to be effective in linking assessment to development of appropriate interventions. The present results add to the evidence that rapid assessment is an important public health tool.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the World Health Organization's rapid assessment and response (RAR) method of assessing injection drug use and its associated health problems, focusing on knowledge gain, capacity building, and whether RAR leads to the development of interventions reducing the health effects of injection drug use. METHODS: Data were derived from RAR studies conducted in Beijing, China; Bogotá, Colombia; Greater Rosario, Argentina; Hanoi, Vietnam; Kharkiv, Ukraine; Minsk, Belarus; Nairobi, Kenya; Penang, Malaysia; St. Petersburg, Russia; and Tehran, Iran. RESULTS: Substantial gains in knowledge and response capacity were reported at all of the study sites. Before RAR initiation, prevention and intervention programs had been absent or inadequate at most of the sites. The RARs resulted in many new or modified interventions; 7 sites reported 24 health-related interventions that were subsequently developed and influenced by the RARs. CONCLUSIONS: RARs, which require relatively little external funding, appear to be effective in linking assessment to development of appropriate interventions. The present results add to the evidence that rapid assessment is an important public health tool.
Authors: Richard H Needle; Robert T Trotter; Merrill Singer; Christopher Bates; J Bryan Page; David Metzger; Louis H Marcelin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Catherine S Todd; Mark A Stibich; M Raza Stanekzai; M Zafar Rasuli; Shairshah Bayan; Saifur Rehman Wardak; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2008-01-22
Authors: Alice K Asher; Judith A Hahn; Marie-Claude Couture; Kelsey Maher; Kimberly Page Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2012-11-17 Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Gabriel J Culbert; Agung Waluyo; Mariska Iriyanti; Azalia P Muchransyah; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Frederick L Altice Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-01-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Nadine Ezard; Edna Oppenheimer; Ann Burton; Marian Schilperoord; David Macdonald; Moruf Adelekan; Abandokoth Sakarati; Mark van Ommeren Journal: Confl Health Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 2.723
Authors: Charles M Cleland; Don C Des Jarlais; Theresa E Perlis; Gerry Stimson; Vladimir Poznyak Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.295