BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper was to examine the context of injection drug use in Kabul, Afghanistan among injection drug users (IDUs) utilising and not utilising needle and syringe programmes (NSPs). METHODS: Following identification of themes from eight focus group discussions, free-lists were used for further exploration with both NSP using (n=30) and non-NSP using (n=31) IDUs. RESULTS: All participants were male, had been injecting for 5 years (mean), and most (95%) had been refugees in the past decade. Main reasons for sharing syringes were convenience and lack of availability and did not vary based on NSP use. Drug users perceived alienation from the community, evidenced by names used for drug users by the community which convey social stigma and moral judgment. Health risks were the principal stated risk associated with drug use, which was mentioned more frequently by NSP users. Harm reduction services available in Kabul are perceived to be insufficient for those in need of services, resulting in under utilisation. The limited scope and distribution of services was frequently cited both as an area for improvement among NSP using IDU or as a reason not to use existing programmes. CONCLUSIONS: While some positive differences emerged among NSP-using IDU, the current context indicates that both rapid scale-up and increased variety of services, particularly in the realm of addiction treatment, are urgently needed in this setting.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper was to examine the context of injection drug use in Kabul, Afghanistan among injection drug users (IDUs) utilising and not utilising needle and syringe programmes (NSPs). METHODS: Following identification of themes from eight focus group discussions, free-lists were used for further exploration with both NSP using (n=30) and non-NSP using (n=31) IDUs. RESULTS: All participants were male, had been injecting for 5 years (mean), and most (95%) had been refugees in the past decade. Main reasons for sharing syringes were convenience and lack of availability and did not vary based on NSP use. Drug users perceived alienation from the community, evidenced by names used for drug users by the community which convey social stigma and moral judgment. Health risks were the principal stated risk associated with drug use, which was mentioned more frequently by NSP users. Harm reduction services available in Kabul are perceived to be insufficient for those in need of services, resulting in under utilisation. The limited scope and distribution of services was frequently cited both as an area for improvement among NSP using IDU or as a reason not to use existing programmes. CONCLUSIONS: While some positive differences emerged among NSP-using IDU, the current context indicates that both rapid scale-up and increased variety of services, particularly in the realm of addiction treatment, are urgently needed in this setting.
Authors: Gerry V Stimson; Chris Fitch; Don DesJarlais; Vladimir Poznyak; Theresa Perlis; Edna Oppenheimer; Tim Rhodes Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-12-27 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Catherine S Todd; Abdul Nasir; Mohammad Raza Stanekzai; Abdullah M S Abed; Steffanie A Strathdee; Christian T Bautista; Paul T Scott; Boulos A Botros; Jeffrey Tjaden Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Catherine S Todd; David Macdonald; Kaveh Khoshnood; G Farooq Mansoor; Mark Eggerman; Catherine Panter-Brick Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2012-06-18
Authors: Nadine Ezard; Edna Oppenheimer; Ann Burton; Marian Schilperoord; David Macdonald; Moruf Adelekan; Abandokoth Sakarati; Mark van Ommeren Journal: Confl Health Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 2.723
Authors: Catherine S Todd; Abdul Nasir; M Raza Stanekzai; Katja Fiekert; M Zafar Rasuli; David Vlahov; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2011-08-25
Authors: Catherine S Todd; Abdul Nasir; Mohammad Raza Stanekzai; Katja Fiekert; Heather L Sipsma; David Vlahov; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2015-10-16