Literature DB >> 16377604

Facilitating informed decision making about breast cancer risk and genetic counseling among women calling the NCI's Cancer Information Service.

Suzanne M Miller1, Linda Fleisher, Pagona Roussi, Joanne S Buzaglo, Robert Schnoll, Elyse Slater, Susan Raysor, Melania Popa-Mabe.   

Abstract

Despite increased interest among the public in breast cancer genetic risk and genetic testing, there are limited services to help women make informed decisions about genetic testing. This study, conducted with female callers (N = 279) to the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service (CIS), developed and evaluated a theory-based, educational intervention designed to increase callers' understanding of the following: (a) the kinds of information required to determine inherited risk; (b) their own personal family history of cancer; and (c) the benefits and limitations of genetic testing. Callers requesting information about breast/ovarian cancer risk, risk assessment services, and genetic testing were randomized to either: (1) standard care or (2) an educational intervention. Results show that the educational intervention reduced intention to obtain genetic testing among women at average risk and increased intention among high-risk women at 6 months. In addition, high monitors, who typically attend to and seek information, demonstrated greater increases in knowledge and perceived risk over the 6-month interval than low monitors, who typically are distracted from information. These findings suggest that theoretically designed interventions can be effective in helping women understand their cancer risk and appropriate risk assessment options and can be implemented successfully within a service program like the CIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16377604     DOI: 10.1080/07366290500265335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  25 in total

1.  Bridging the critical chasm between service and research: the Cancer Information Service's collaboratory.

Authors:  Linda Squiers; Nigel Bush; Robin Vanderpool; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Cecilia Fabrizio
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Enhanced counselling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: Impact on knowledge and psychological distress-results from a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry Anne Sherman; Suzanne Miller; Joanne Buzaglo; Mary Daly; Alan Taylor; Eric Ross; Andrew Godwin
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-02

5.  Trait anxiety, information modality, and responses to communications about prenatal genetic testing.

Authors:  Cécile Muller; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-01-31

6.  The NCI's Cancer Information Service's Research Continuum Framework: integrating research into cancer education practice (1999-2004).

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Julie Kornfeld; Sharon Davis; Marion E Morra; Linda Squiers
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Too many referrals of low-risk women for BRCA1/2 genetic services by family physicians.

Authors:  Della Brown White; Vence L Bonham; Jean Jenkins; Nancy Stevens; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

9.  Attitudinal barriers to participation in oncology clinical trials: factor analysis and correlates of barriers.

Authors:  S Manne; D Kashy; T Albrecht; Y-N Wong; A Lederman Flamm; A B Benson; S M Miller; Linda Fleisher; J Buzaglo; N Roach; M Katz; E Ross; M Collins; D Poole; S Raivitch; D M Miller; T G Kinzy; T Liu; N J Meropol
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.520

10.  Recruiting low-income healthy women to research: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Celia P Kaplan; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.