Literature DB >> 16377061

Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse.

Mohamed A Hefni1, Tarek A El-Toukhy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to evaluate the safety and long-term outcome of sacrospinous colpopexy in marked genital prolapse.
SETTING: Gynaecology Department, Benenden Hospital, Kent, UK.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted between September 1993 and May 2000 on 305 women who underwent transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. The indications for surgery were marked vault prolapse in 43% and uterovaginal prolapse or enterocele in 57%. Patient follow up was at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and then annually. Data was collected prospectively at the time of initial recruitment, during hospital stay and at the end of each follow up visit.
RESULTS: Hysterectomy was performed in 117 patients and anterior colporrhaphy in 182. The mean operative time for the entire surgery was 65.6 min (S.D. 27.4, range 20-160 min) and estimated blood loss was 81.8 ml (S.D. 92, range 20-800 ml). After a mean follow up period of 57 months (range 24-84), vault support was maintained in 96%; recurrent vault prolapse occurred in 12 patients (4%) and the mean vaginal length at 1 and 5 years of follow up was 8+/-0.9 and 7.8+/-1.2 cm. Symptomatic cystocele occurred in 15 patients (5%). There were six recurrences of rectocele (2%) and there was no enterocele recurrence. Sexual function was maintained in all sexually active women and 43% reported improvement in sexual function. Out of 14 women who complained of fecal incontinence, 10 (71%) reported cure and 3 (21%) improved after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy is associated with a high long-term success rate in correcting upper genital prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16377061     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  23 in total

1.  Anorectal symptoms before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpoperineopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Marcos Ballester; Elisabeth Chereau; Charles Bui; Roman Rouzier; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Rectocutaneous fistula with transmigration of the suture: a rare delayed complication of vault fixation with the sacrospinous ligament.

Authors:  Pratima Datta Kadam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Joyce de Jong; Marieke Huisman; Steven Schraffordt Koops; Peter Heintz; Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-24

Review 4.  Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; C Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 5.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Shveta Kapoor; Kanapathippillai Sivanesan; Jessica Amy Robertson; Mayooran Veerasingham; Vishal Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The resurrection of sacrospinous fixation: unilateral apical sling hysteropexy.

Authors:  Dmitry Shkarupa; Nikita Kubin; Ekaterina Shapovalova; Anastasya Zaytseva
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Bilateral sacrospinous fixation without hysterectomy: 18-month follow-up.

Authors:  Mehmet Baki Şentürk; Hakan Güraslan; Yusuf Çakmak; Murat Ekin
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

10.  Pelvic floor consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request in women with a single birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Julie S Ivy; Divya A Patel; Sejal N Patel; Dean G Smith; Scott B Ransom; Dee Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.