Literature DB >> 17384894

The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

Viviane Dietz1, Joyce de Jong, Marieke Huisman, Steven Schraffordt Koops, Peter Heintz, Huub van der Vaart.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation of the uterus as a primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. In this observational study, 133 women underwent a sacrospinous hysteropexy. Data were obtained from their medical records, and standardized questionnaires about urogenital symptoms and quality of life were used. All women were invited for gynecological examination, using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification score. Ninety-nine women responded by returning the questionnaire (mean age, 59.2 and follow-up time, 22.5 months); 60 of these women underwent gynecologic examination. Eighty-four percent of women were highly satisfied about the outcome of the procedure. Serious complications were rare. The recurrence rate of descensus uteri that needed surgical treatment was 2.3%. The recurrence of cystoceles after surgery was 35%, but there were no differences in urogenital symptoms between women with or without a cystocele.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17384894     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0336-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  15 in total

1.  Vaginal configuration on MRI after abdominal sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension.

Authors:  E H Sze; J Meranus; N Kohli; J R Miklos; M M Karram
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2001

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings following three different vaginal vault prolapse repair procedures: a randomised study.

Authors:  Ajay Rane; Yik Nyok Lim; Grant Withey; Reinhold Muller
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.100

3.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The urinary diary in evaluation of incontinent women: a test-retest analysis.

Authors:  J F Wyman; S C Choi; S W Harkins; M S Wilson; J A Fantl
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?

Authors:  C F Maher; M P Cary; M C Slack; C J Murray; M Milligan; P Schluter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2001

6.  Bilateral transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy: preliminary experience.

Authors:  J F Pohl; J L Frattarelli
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited.

Authors:  C Huub van der Vaart; J Rob J de Leeuw; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; A Peter M Heintz
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Anatomic and functional assessment and risk factors of recurrent prolapse after vaginal sacrospinous fixation.

Authors:  Kari Nieminen; Heini Huhtala; Pentti K Heinonen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vault and marked uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  M P Carey; M C Slack
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-06

10.  Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept.

Authors:  M Hefni; T El-Toukhy; J Bhaumik; E Katsimanis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; C Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 2.  Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.

Authors:  Nathan Kow; Howard B Goldman; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Treatment of vaginal vault prolapse in The Netherlands: a clinical practice survey.

Authors:  Carolien K M Vermeulen; Anne Lotte W M Coolen; Wilbert A Spaans; Jan Paul W R Roovers; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and uterine descent in the Netherlands.

Authors:  R J Detollenaere; J den Boon; K B Kluivers; M E Vierhout; H W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Anterior vaginal mesh sacrospinous hysteropexy and posterior fascial plication for anterior compartment dominated uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Benjamin Feiner; Lieke Gietelink; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Technique of anterior colporrhaphy: a Dutch evaluation.

Authors:  Ellen J M Lensen; Jackie A Stoutjesdijk; Mariella I J Withagen; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 1- to 4-year follow-up of women postoperatively.

Authors:  Philip Rahmanou; B White; N Price; S Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Analysis of risk factors associated with surgical failure of sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Huey-Yi Chen; Tsan-Hung Chiu; Ming Ho; Yao-Ching Hung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.