Literature DB >> 16373735

Shape of glass and amount of alcohol poured: comparative study of effect of practice and concentration.

Brian Wansink1, Koert van Ittersum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether people pour different amounts into short, wide glasses than into tall, slender ones.
DESIGN: College students practised pouring alcohol into a standard glass before pouring into larger glasses; bartenders poured alcohol for four mixed drinks either with no instructions or after being told to take their time.
SETTING: University town and large city, United States. PARTICIPANTS: 198 college students and 86 bartenders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Volume of alcohol poured into short, wide and tall, slender glasses.
RESULTS: Aiming to pour a "shot" of alcohol (1.5 ounces, 44.3 ml), both students and bartenders poured more into short, wide glasses than into tall slender glasses (46.1 ml v 44.7 ml and 54.6 ml v 46.4 ml, respectively). Practice reduced the tendency to overpour, but not for short, wide glasses. Despite an average of six years of experience, bartenders poured 20.5% more into short, wide glasses than tall, slender ones; paying careful attention reduced but did not eliminate the effect.
CONCLUSIONS: To avoid overpouring, use tall, narrow glasses or ones on which the alcohol level is premarked. To avoid underestimating the amount of alcohol consumed, studies using self reports of standard drinks should ask about the shape of the glass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16373735      PMCID: PMC1322248          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  Measuring quantity and frequency of drinking in a general population survey: a comparison of five indices.

Authors:  P Lemmens; E S Tan; R A Knibbe
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1992-09

Review 2.  How much alcohol is in a 'standard drink'? An analysis of 125 studies.

Authors:  C Turner
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1990-09

3.  Calculating standard drink units: international comparisons.

Authors:  W R Miller; N Heather; W Hall
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-01

4.  Super Bowls: serving bowl size and food consumption.

Authors:  Brian Wansink; Matthew M Cheney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The standard drink and alcohol consumption.

Authors:  S J Carruthers; C W Binns
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  1992

6.  Estimating alcohol content of drinks: common errors in applying the unit system.

Authors:  T Stockwell; L Stirling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-03-04

7.  The effect of 'standard drink' labelling on the ability of drinkers to pour a 'standard drink'.

Authors:  T Stockwell; D Blaze-Temple; C Walker
Journal:  Aust J Public Health       Date:  1991-03

8.  The alcohol content of self-report and 'standard' drinks.

Authors:  P H Lemmens
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.526

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Family, community and clinic collaboration to treat overweight and obese children: Stanford GOALS-A randomized controlled trial of a three-year, multi-component, multi-level, multi-setting intervention.

Authors:  Thomas N Robinson; Donna Matheson; Manisha Desai; Darrell M Wilson; Dana L Weintraub; William L Haskell; Arianna McClain; Samuel McClure; Jorge A Banda; Lee M Sanders; K Farish Haydel; Joel D Killen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  The subjective effects of alcohol-tobacco co-use: an ecological momentary assessment investigation.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki; Seungmin Jahng; Phillip K Wood; Brandon M Robertson; Amee J Epler; Nikole J Cronk; John W Rohrbaugh; Andrew C Heath; Saul Shiffman; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-08

Review 3.  Understanding standard drinks and drinking guidelines.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Tim Stockwell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2011-11-03

4.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) accurately compare poured liquid quantities.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Consumption outcomes in clinical trials of alcohol use disorder treatment: Consideration of standard drink misestimation.

Authors:  Megan Kirouac; Eric Kruger; Adam D Wilson; Kevin A Hallgren; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 6.  Hangover and risk for alcohol use disorders: existing evidence and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki; Brandon M Robertson; Amee J Epler
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2010-06

Review 7.  Environmental strategies for portion control in children.

Authors:  Thomas N Robinson; Donna M Matheson
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 8.  Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: recent advances and opportunities.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; William C Kerr
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Alcohol content variation of bar and restaurant drinks in Northern California.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Deidre Patterson; Mary Albert Koenen; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Chimpanzees sometimes see fuller as better: judgments of food quantities based on container size and fullness.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.