Literature DB >> 18616674

Alcohol content variation of bar and restaurant drinks in Northern California.

William C Kerr1, Deidre Patterson, Mary Albert Koenen, Thomas K Greenfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the average of and sources of variation in the alcohol content of drinks served on premise in 10 Northern Californian counties.
METHODS: Focus groups of bartenders were conducted to evaluate potential sources of drink alcohol content variation. In the main study, 80 establishments were visited by a team of research personnel who purchased and measured the volume of particular beer, wine, and spirit drinks. Brand or analysis of a sample of the drink was used to determine the alcohol concentration by volume.
RESULTS: The average wine drink was found to contain 43% more alcohol than a standard drink, with no difference between red and white wine. The average draught beer was 22% greater than the standard. Spirit drinks differed by type with the average shot being equal to one standard drink while mixed drinks were 42% greater. Variation in alcohol content was particularly wide for wine and mixed spirit drinks. No significant differences in mean drink alcohol content were observed by county for beer or spirits but one county was lower than two others for wine.
CONCLUSIONS: On premise drinks typically contained more alcohol than the standard drink with the exception of shots and bottled beers. Wine and mixed spirit drinks were the largest with nearly 1.5 times the alcohol of a standard drink on average. Consumers should be made aware of these substantial differences and key sources of variation in drink alcohol content, and research studies should utilize this information in the interpretation of reported numbers of drinks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18616674      PMCID: PMC2574782          DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00741.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  10 in total

1.  Do college students drink more than they think? Use of a free-pour paradigm to determine how college students define standard drinks.

Authors:  Aaron M White; Courtney L Kraus; Lindsey A McCracken; H Scott Swartzwelder
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  National and state estimates of the mean ethanol content of beer sold in the US and their impact on per capita consumption estimates: 1988 to 2001.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Stephan Brown; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  College students lack knowledge of standard drink volumes: implications for definitions of risky drinking based on survey data.

Authors:  Aaron M White; Courtney L Kraus; Julie D Flom; Lori A Kestenbaum; Jamie R Mitchell; Kunal Shah; H Scott Swartzwelder
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Estimates of the mean alcohol concentration of the spirits, wine, and beer sold in the United States and per capita consumption: 1950 to 2002.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Thomas K Greenfield; Jennifer Tujague
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Shape of glass and amount of alcohol poured: comparative study of effect of practice and concentration.

Authors:  Brian Wansink; Koert van Ittersum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-24

6.  The alcohol content of wine consumed in the US and per capita consumption: new estimates reveal different trends.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Thomas K Greenfield; Jennifer Tujague; Stephan E Brown
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  A drink is a drink? Variation in the amount of alcohol contained in beer, wine and spirits drinks in a US methodological sample.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Thomas K Greenfield; Jennifer Tujague; Stephan E Brown
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Does the concept of a standard drink apply to viticultural societies?

Authors:  A Gual; A R Martos; A Lligoña; J J Llopis
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 9.  Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: recent advances and opportunities.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; William C Kerr
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  The alcohol content of self-report and 'standard' drinks.

Authors:  P H Lemmens
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.526

  10 in total
  26 in total

1.  Not all drinks are created equal: implications for alcohol assessment in India.

Authors:  Madhabika B Nayak; William Kerr; Thomas K Greenfield; Aravind Pillai
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.826

2.  Assessment of alcoholic standard drinks using the Munich composite international diagnostic interview (M-CIDI): An evaluation and subsequent revision.

Authors:  Sören Kuitunen-Paul; Jürgen Rehm; Dirk W Lachenmeier; Firdeus Kadrić; Paula T Kuitunen; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Jakob Manthey
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  U.S. trends in light, moderate, and heavy drinking episodes from 2000 to 2010.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Nina Mulia; Sarah E Zemore
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Physicians' prescription for lifetime abstainers aged 40 to 50 to take a drink a day is not yet justified.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; William C Kerr
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Adjustments for drink size and ethanol content: new results from a self-report diary and transdermal sensor validation study.

Authors:  Jason C Bond; Thomas K Greenfield; Deidre Patterson; William C Kerr
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  A modified Timeline Followback assessment to capture alcohol exposure in pregnant women: Application in the Safe Passage Study.

Authors:  Kimberly Dukes; Tara Tripp; Julie Petersen; Fay Robinson; Hein Odendaal; Amy Elliott; Marian Willinger; Dale Hereld; Cheryl Raffo; Hannah C Kinney; Coen Groenewald; Jyoti Angal; Rebecca Young; Larry Burd
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 7.  Understanding standard drinks and drinking guidelines.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Tim Stockwell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2011-11-03

8.  The Future of Research on Alcohol-Related Disparities Across U.S. Racial/Ethnic Groups: A Plan of Attack.

Authors:  Sarah E Zemore; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Nina Mulia; William C Kerr; Cindy L Ehlers; Won Kim Cook; Priscilla Martinez; Camillia Lui; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 9.  Self-estimation of blood alcohol concentration: a review.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Aston; Anthony Liguori
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Risks of alcohol use disorders related to drinking patterns in the U.S. general population.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; Yu Ye; Jason Bond; William C Kerr; Madhabika B Nayak; Lee Ann Kaskutas; Raymond F Anton; Raye Z Litten; Henry R Kranzler
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.