Literature DB >> 16371842

Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for surgical failure.

Matthew Yung1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present the value of a dedicated ear audit clinic, the overall long-term results of ossiculoplasty, and the reasons for surgical failure. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis was performed on ossiculoplasty cases in a county hospital. The information was extracted from a computer database. Individual patient case records were reviewed in all cases of surgical failure.
METHODS: All patients who had ossiculoplasty were routinely followed-up in a dedicated ear audit clinic on a yearly basis. Between 1988 and 1999, the author performed 242 ossiculoplasties and their outcomes were monitored in the ear audit clinic. The 5-year results are presented.
RESULTS: Even with the benefit of a dedicated audit clinic and a stable population, only 74.4% of ears had a known outcome at 5 years after ossiculoplasty. In the present series, 61.1% of partial and 37.6% of total ossicular reconstructions have an air-bone gap of 20 dB or better at 5 years. Of 83 identifiable late failures, 47 were caused by persistent or recurrent abnormalities within the middle ear and only 36 were thought to be caused by prosthesis-related or surgeon-related problems.
CONCLUSION: The overall long-term results of ossiculoplasty have not dramatically improved in recent years, in spite of all the great advances in biomedical technologies. Unless there is a breakthrough in the understanding and management of the underlying otitis media, the long-term outcome of ossiculoplasty is unlikely to improve dramatically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16371842     DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000176173.94764.f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  [Quality control following reconstructive middle ear surgery: from bench to bedside].

Authors:  C Offergeld
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Clinical investigation of flat panel CT following middle ear reconstruction: a study of 107 patients.

Authors:  K Zaoui; J Kromeier; M Neudert; T Beleites; T Zahnert; R Laszig; C Offergeld
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Long term results of the titanium clip prosthesis.

Authors:  Antoniu-Oreste Gostian; Jean-Marc Kouame; Martin Bremke; Magdalene Ortmann; Karl Bernd Hüttenbrink; Dirk Beutner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Sultan Şevik Eliçora; Duygu Erdem; Aykut Erdem Dinç; Murat Damar; Sultan Bişkin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Evaluation of functional results of CWD surgery with ossicular replacement prosthesis due to cholesteatoma using computed tomography.

Authors:  Selcuk Ucar; Mete Iseri; Murat Ozturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Experimental investigation of rotational tomography in reconstructed middle ears with clinical implications.

Authors:  Christian Offergeld; Jan Kromeier; Saumil N Merchant; Nicoloz Lasurashvili; Marcus Neudert; Matthias Bornitz; Roland Laszig; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Ossiculoplasty: revisited.

Authors:  R S Mudhol; A I Naragund; V S Shruthi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-13

8.  A Study of Use of Autologous Cartilage in Ossicular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Prakash Nagenahlli Siddappa; Puneeth Poojar Jayakumar; Dheeraj Kumar Jonnalagadda
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-19

9.  Applicability of autologous incus: the influence of age and localization of cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Milan Stankovic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Total ossiculoplasty: advantages of two-point stabilization technique.

Authors:  Leonard Berenholz; John Burkey; William Lippy
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.