Literature DB >> 16369789

Determinants guiding alternate foot placement selection and the behavioral responses are similar when avoiding a real or a virtual obstacle.

Renato Moraes1, Aftab E Patla.   

Abstract

In this study we validate the use of a virtual planar obstacle paradigm to study the avoidance of a real obstacle, such as a hole, during locomotion. Also we further validate the economy determinant implicated with the minimization of foot displacement from its normal landing position during alternate foot placement. Participants were asked to perform two blocks of trials: real (a real hole was embedded in the pathway and participants were requested to avoid stepping into it) and virtual (a virtual planar obstacle was displayed on the screen of a liquid crystal display monitor). Trunk and feet kinematics were monitored, as well as electromyography (EMG) activity of 14 muscles of both lower limbs and trunk. The results of this study showed that the dominant choice for each obstacle investigated was not different between the real and virtual conditions. In addition, dynamic stability, economy and forward progression determinants guiding alternate foot placement were similarly satisfied. Thus the use of virtual planar obstacle in adaptive locomotion study is appropriate. EMG data were used to compute an index relating the changes in muscle activity relative to the normal walking profile. This EMG index was significantly and positively correlated with the amount of foot displacement for the adaptive step. The fact that the dominant choice resulted in minimum foot displacement from its normal landing spot combined with minimal changes in muscle activity validates conclusively the economy determinant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16369789     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0297-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Biomechanical factors affecting running economy.

Authors:  H Kyröläinen; A Belli; P V Komi
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Determination of worker physiological cost in workspace reach envelopes.

Authors:  Arijit K Sengupta; Biman Das
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Muscle oxygen consumption, determined by NIRS, in relation to external force and EMG.

Authors:  M Praagman; H E J Veeger; E K J Chadwick; W N J M Colier; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles.

Authors:  A E Patla; S D Prentice; C Robinson; J Neufeld
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Characteristics of voluntary visual sampling of the environment for safe locomotion over different terrains.

Authors:  A E Patla; A Adkin; C Martin; R Holden; S Prentice
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic tools in gait analysis.

Authors:  J F Yang; D A Winter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking.

Authors:  J M Donelan; R Kram; A D Kuo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Energetics and optimization of human walking and running: the 2000 Raymond Pearl memorial lecture.

Authors:  R McNeill Alexander
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

9.  The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; K R Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking.

Authors:  J Maxwell Donelan; Rodger Kram; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Online adjustments of leg movements in healthy young and old.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of a cognitive task on online adjustments when avoiding stepping on an obstacle and stepping on a target during walking in young adults.

Authors:  Andréia Abud da Silva Costa; Luciana Oliveira Dos Santos; Renato Moraes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Split-second decisions on a split belt: does simulated limping affect obstacle avoidance?

Authors:  Jacques Duysens; Zrinka Potocanac; Judith Hegeman; Sabine Verschueren; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Control of vertical posture while elevating one foot to avoid a real or virtual obstacle.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ida; Sambit Mohapatra; Alexander Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor cost affects the decision of when to shift gaze for guiding movement.

Authors:  F Javier Domínguez-Zamora; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Quick foot placement adjustments during gait: direction matters.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Zrinka Potocanac; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Slow maturation of planning in obstacle avoidance in humans.

Authors:  Sharissa H A Corporaal; Stephan P Swinnen; Jacques Duysens; Sjoerd M Bruijn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Fast online corrections of tripping responses.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Janneke de Bruin; Susanne van der Veen; Sabine Verschueren; Jaap van Dieën; Jacques Duysens; Mirjam Pijnappels
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of aging and dual tasking on step adjustments to perturbations in visually cued walking.

Authors:  Masood Mazaheri; Wouter Hoogkamer; Zrinka Potocanac; Sabine Verschueren; Melvyn Roerdink; Peter J Beek; C E Peper; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Binocular vision and the control of foot placement during walking in natural terrain.

Authors:  Kathryn Bonnen; Jonathan S Matthis; Agostino Gibaldi; Martin S Banks; Dennis M Levi; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.