Literature DB >> 12409498

Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking.

J Maxwell Donelan1, Rodger Kram, Arthur D Kuo.   

Abstract

In the single stance phase of walking, center of mass motion resembles that of an inverted pendulum. Theoretically, mechanical work is not necessary for producing the pendular motion, but work is needed to redirect the center of mass velocity from one pendular arc to the next during the transition between steps. A collision model predicts a rate of negative work proportional to the fourth power of step length. Positive work is required to restore the energy lost, potentially exacting a proportional metabolic cost. We tested these predictions with humans (N=9) walking over a range of step lengths (0.4-1.1 m) while keeping step frequency fixed at 1.8 Hz. We measured individual limb external mechanical work using force plates, and metabolic rate using indirect calorimetry. As predicted, average negative and positive external mechanical work rates increased with the fourth power of step length (from 1 W to 38 W; r(2)=0.96). Metabolic rate also increased with the fourth power of step length (from 7 W to 379 W; r(2)=0.95), and linearly with mechanical work rate. Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions, rather than pendular motion itself, appears to be a major determinant of the metabolic cost of walking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12409498     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.23.3717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  163 in total

1.  Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Rodger Kram; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Stance and swing phase costs in human walking.

Authors:  Brian R Umberger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Mechanical and energetic consequences of reduced ankle plantar-flexion in human walking.

Authors:  Tzu-wei P Huang; Kenneth A Shorter; Peter G Adamczyk; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Walking dynamics are symmetric (enough).

Authors:  M Mert Ankaralı; Shahin Sefati; Manu S Madhav; Andrew Long; Amy J Bastian; Noah J Cowan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  The influence of orthosis options on walking parameters in spinal cord-injured patients: a literature review.

Authors:  M Arazpour; M Samadian; K Ebrahimzadeh; M Ahmadi Bani; S W Hutchins
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Minimizing Postural Demands of Walking While Still Emphasizing Locomotor Force Generation for Nonimpaired Individuals.

Authors:  Sarah A Graham; Christopher P Hurt; David A Brown
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Motor learning versus standard walking exercise in older adults with subclinical gait dysfunction: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jennifer S Brach; Jessie M Van Swearingen; Subashan Perera; David M Wert; Stephanie Studenski
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Elastic coupling of limb joints enables faster bipedal walking.

Authors:  J C Dean; A D Kuo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Mechanical and energetic consequences of rolling foot shape in human walking.

Authors:  Peter G Adamczyk; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Forward dynamics simulations provide insight into muscle mechanical work during human locomotion.

Authors:  Richard R Neptune; Craig P McGowan; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.