Literature DB >> 11571044

Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking.

J M Donelan1, R Kram, A D Kuo.   

Abstract

We studied the selection of preferred step width in human walking by measuring mechanical and metabolic costs as a function of experimentally manipulated step width (0.00-0.45L, as a fraction of leg length L). We estimated mechanical costs from individual limb external mechanical work and metabolic costs using open circuit respirometry. The mechanical and metabolic costs both increased substantially (54 and 45%, respectively) for widths greater than the preferred value (0.15-0.45L) and with step width squared (R(2) = 0.91 and 0.83, respectively). As predicted by a three-dimensional model of walking mechanics, the increases in these costs appear to be a result of the mechanical work required for redirecting the centre of mass velocity during the transition between single stance phases (step-to-step transition costs). The metabolic cost for steps narrower than preferred (0.10-0.00L) increased by 8%, which was probably as a result of the added cost of moving the swing leg laterally in order to avoid the stance leg (lateral limb swing cost). Trade-offs between the step-to-step transition and lateral limb swing costs resulted in a minimum metabolic cost at a step width of 0.12L, which is not significantly different from foot width (0.11L) or the preferred step width (0.13L). Humans appear to prefer a step width that minimizes metabolic cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11571044      PMCID: PMC1088839          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling.

Authors:  M Garcia; A Chatterjee; A Ruina; M Coleman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Force platforms as ergometers.

Authors:  G A Cavagna
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; N C Heglund; C R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1977-11

4.  Walking patterns in healthy old men.

Authors:  M P Murray; R C Kory; B H Clarkson
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1969-04

5.  Comparative cost of walking in young and old adults.

Authors:  R L Waters; H J Hislop; J Perry; L Thomas; J Campbell
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Active control of lateral balance in human walking.

Authors:  C E Bauby; A D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Walking patterns of men with parkinsonism.

Authors:  M P Murray; S B Sepic; G M Gardner; W J Downs
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1978-12

8.  Energy cost of walking in normal children and teenagers.

Authors:  R L Waters; H J Hislop; L Thomas; J Campbell
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.449

9.  Energy requirements and energy expenditure of elderly men.

Authors:  D H Calloway; E Zanni
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; K R Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  137 in total

1.  Strategies and determinants for selection of alternate foot placement during human locomotion: influence of spatial and temporal constraints.

Authors:  Renato Moraes; M Anthony Lewis; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Rodger Kram; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Abnormal joint powers before and after the onset of claudication symptoms.

Authors:  Panagiotis Koutakis; Jason M Johanning; Gleb R Haynatzki; Sara A Myers; Nicholas Stergiou; G Matthew Longo; Iraklis I Pipinos
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Gait biomechanics, spatial and temporal characteristics, and the energy cost of walking in older adults with impaired mobility.

Authors:  David M Wert; Jennifer Brach; Subashan Perera; Jessie M VanSwearingen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-05-20

5.  Stance and swing phase costs in human walking.

Authors:  Brian R Umberger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Mechanical and energetic consequences of reduced ankle plantar-flexion in human walking.

Authors:  Tzu-wei P Huang; Kenneth A Shorter; Peter G Adamczyk; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Using step width to compare locomotor biomechanics between extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs and modern obligate bipeds.

Authors:  P J Bishop; C J Clemente; R E Weems; D F Graham; L P Lamas; J R Hutchinson; J Rubenson; R S Wilson; S A Hocknull; R S Barrett; D G Lloyd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Proprioceptive feedback and preferred patterns of human movement.

Authors:  Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.230

9.  Elastic coupling of limb joints enables faster bipedal walking.

Authors:  J C Dean; A D Kuo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Effects of aging and arm swing on the metabolic cost of stability in human walking.

Authors:  Justus D Ortega; Leslie A Fehlman; Claire T Farley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.