Literature DB >> 16369783

Perceived versus actual head-on-trunk orientation during arm movement control.

Michel Guerraz1, Jordan Navarro, Frédéric Ferrero, Jacques Cremieux, Jean Blouin.   

Abstract

Static roll head tilt induces bias in the trajectory of upper limb voluntary movements. The aim of the experiment was to investigate whether this bias is dependant on the perception of body configuration rather than on its actual configuration. We used the 'return' phenomenon as a method to produce dissociation between perceived and actual head tilt. Static roll head tilt in supine subjects was sustained for 15 min during which subjects were periodically required to estimate verbally the tilt of their head respective to their trunk and draw, with their right index finger, straight lines aligned with their trunk. After 15 min, subjects' head were realigned with the trunk, and subjects continued to give verbal estimate of head position and perform the motor task. Results showed that the initial angular deviation of the lines in the direction opposite to head tilt gradually diminished. The adaptation was noticeable within the first 3-5 min of tilt and subsequently diminished. Verbal estimates confirmed the return phenomenon, i.e. subjects perceived their head as slowly returning towards its neutral position after a few minutes of sustained tilt. When realigned with the trunk, subjects experienced the illusion that their head was tilted in the opposite direction to the initial head tilt and a line deviation in the opposite direction to those made on initial exposure was observed (after-effect). These results indicate that the angular deviation in motor production observed in condition of static head tilt were largely related to the perceived body configuration and therefore favour the hypothesis that the conscious perception of body configuration plays a key role in organising sensorimotor tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16369783     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0316-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Perception of angular head position during attempted alignment with eccentric visual objects.

Authors:  W Becker; H Saglam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of eye, head, and shoulder geometry in the planning of accurate arm movements.

Authors:  D Y P Henriques; J D Crawford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reorientation of a visually evoked postural response during passive whole body rotation.

Authors:  A Thurrell; P Bertholon; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Role of eye and neck proprioceptive mechanisms in body orientation and motor coordination.

Authors:  L A COHEN
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  From head orientation to hand control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Asymmetric optokinetic after-nystagmus induced by active or passive sustained head rotations.

Authors:  M Karlberg; M Magnusson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  From balance regulation to body orientation: two goals for muscle proprioceptive information processing?

Authors:  A Kavounoudias; J C Gilhodes; R Roll; J P Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Postural effects of neck muscle vibration in man.

Authors:  S Lund
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1980-12-15

9.  Neck proprioception and spatial orientation in cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Marco Bove; Giampaolo Brichetto; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Roberta Marchese; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Human perception of horizontal trunk and head rotation in space during vestibular and neck stimulation.

Authors:  T Mergner; C Siebold; G Schweigart; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  4 in total

1.  Postural reorientation does not cause the locomotor after-effect following rotary locomotion.

Authors:  Callum J Osler; Raymond F Reynolds
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects.

Authors:  M C Simani; L M M McGuire; P N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The internal representation of head orientation differs for conscious perception and balance control.

Authors:  Brian H Dalton; Brandon G Rasman; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Does My Neck Make Me Clumsy? A Systematic Review of Clinical and Neurophysiological Studies in Humans.

Authors:  Samantha C Harman; Zhen Zheng; Julie C Kendall; Dein Vindigni; Barbara I Polus
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.