Literature DB >> 11929889

Role of eye, head, and shoulder geometry in the planning of accurate arm movements.

D Y P Henriques1, J D Crawford.   

Abstract

Eye-hand coordination requires the brain to integrate visual information with the continuous changes in eye, head, and arm positions. This is a geometrically complex process because the eyes, head, and shoulder have different centers of rotation. As a result, head rotation causes the eye to translate with respect to the shoulder. The present study examines the consequences of this geometry for planning accurate arm movements in a pointing task with the head at different orientations. When asked to point at an object, subjects oriented their arm to position the fingertip on the line running from the target to the viewing eye. But this eye-target line shifts when the eyes translate with each new head orientation, thereby requiring a new arm pointing direction. We confirmed that subjects do realign their fingertip with the eye-target line during closed-loop pointing across various horizontal head orientations when gaze is on target. More importantly, subjects also showed this head-position-dependent pattern of pointing responses for the same paradigm performed in complete darkness. However, when gaze was not on target, compensation for these translations in the rotational centers partially broke down. As a result, subjects tended to overshoot the target direction relative to current gaze; perhaps explaining previously reported errors in aiming the arm to retinally peripheral targets. These results suggest that knowledge of head position signals and the resulting relative displacements in the centers of rotation of the eye and shoulder are incorporated using open-loop mechanisms for eye-hand coordination, but these translations are best calibrated for foveated, gaze-on-target movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11929889     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00509.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head.

Authors:  D Y P Henriques; W P Medendorp; C C A M Gielen; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interaction between gaze and visual and proprioceptive position judgements.

Authors:  Katja Fiehler; Frank Rösler; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Specialization of reach function in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michael Vesia; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multiple frames of reference for pointing to a remembered target.

Authors:  Martin Lemay; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Peripheral vision for perception and action.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Brooke A Halpert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perceived versus actual head-on-trunk orientation during arm movement control.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jordan Navarro; Frédéric Ferrero; Jacques Cremieux; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback.

Authors:  Siavash Vaziri; Jörn Diedrichsen; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Allocentric cues do not always improve whole body reaching performance.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Yongqin Cui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.