Literature DB >> 16366800

Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity.

Yuhong Jiang1, Joo-Hyun Song.   

Abstract

Humans conduct visual search faster when the same display is presented for a 2nd time, showing implicit learning of repeated displays. This study examines whether learning of a spatial layout transfers to other layouts that are occupied by items of new shapes or colors. The authors show that spatial context learning is sometimes contingent on item identity. For example, when the training session included some trials with black items and other trials with white items, learning of the spatial layout became specific to the trained color--no transfer was seen when items were in a new color during testing. However, when the training session included only trials in black (or white), learning transferred to displays with a new color. Similar results held when items changed shapes after training. The authors conclude that implicit visual learning is sensitive to trial context and that spatial context learning can be identity contingent. (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16366800     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

1.  How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing.

Authors:  Justin A Jungé; Brian J Scholl; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2007

2.  Implicit learning of local context in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Anastasia Kourkoulou; Susan R Leekam; John M Findlay
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-02

3.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  A bias to detail: how hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory.

Authors:  Christopher C Davoli; James R Brockmole; Annabelle Goujon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

6.  Developmental changes in infants' visual short-term memory for location.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes; Karinna B Hurley; Shannon Ross-Sheehy; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-18

7.  The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.

Authors:  A Caglar Tas; Steven J Luck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Rachel S Sussman; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Learning in repeated visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  What is the context of contextual cueing?

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.