Literature DB >> 16366786

How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings.

Natalie Sebanz1, Günther Knoblich, Wolfgang Prinz.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that individuals unintentionally adjust their behavior to others by mimicking others' actions and by synchronizing their actions with others. This study investigated whether individuals form a representation of a coactor's task when the context does not require interpersonal coordination. Pairs of participants performed a reaction time (RT) task alongside each other, responding to 2 different dimensions of the same stimulus. Results showed that each actor's performance was influenced by the other's task. RTs on trials that required a response from both participants were slowed compared with trials that required only a response from 1 actor. Similar results were observed when each participant knew the other's task but could not observe the other's actions. These findings provide evidence that shared task representations are formed in social settings that do not require interpersonal coordination and emerge as a consequence of how a social situation is conceptualized. (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16366786     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  95 in total

1.  Interpersonal memory-based guidance of attention is reduced for ingroup members.

Authors:  Xun He; Anne G Lever; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the Social Simon paradigm.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; Dorit Wenke; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-17

3.  Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Logan Pedersen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-30

4.  Interactional leader-follower sensorimotor communication strategies during repetitive joint actions.

Authors:  Matteo Candidi; Arianna Curioni; Francesco Donnarumma; Lucia Maria Sacheli; Giovanni Pezzulo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Francesca Ciardo; Simone Panajoli; Luisa Lugli; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-25

6.  A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task.

Authors:  Chia-Chin Tsai; Wen-Jui Kuo; Jung-Tai Jing; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J-L Tzeng
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Evolving intentions for social interaction: from entrainment to joint action.

Authors:  Günther Knoblich; Natalie Sebanz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; C Urgesi; G Orgs; S M Aglioti; P Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; En Fu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

10.  A Simon-like effect in Go/No-Go tasks performed in isolation.

Authors:  Karen Davranche; Laurence Carbonnell; Clément Belletier; Franck Vidal; Pascal Huguet; Thibault Gajdos; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.