| Literature DB >> 16361810 |
Ho Jun Chin1, Ki Young Na, Soo Jin Kim, Kook-Hwan Oh, Yon Su Kim, Chun Soo Lim, Suhnggwon Kim, Dong-Wan Chae.
Abstract
The roles of interleukin-10 (IL-10) have been emphasized in several models of glomerulonephritis (GN). Three biallelic polymorphisms within the IL-10 promoter region, at positions -1,082, -819, and -592 from the transcription initiation site, were shown to affect the level of IL-10 production. To investigate the effect of IL-10 promoter polymorphisms on the predisposition to development of GN in Korea, IL-10 promoter polymorphisms were assayed by polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism in 108 patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN), 49 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and 100 healthy controls. In comparison with the control, the frequency of -1,082*G alleles were lower in IgAN and the frequencies of -592*C and -819*C were lower in FSGS, respectively. As for the haplotype, GCC haplotype was less frequent among IgAN than the control and ATA haplotype was more frequent among FSGS than the control (p < 0.05). The frequency of intermediate producer genotypes (GCC/ACC and GCC/ATA) were lower among IgAN or FSGS than the control. Our findings suggested that IL-10 promoter polymorphism predisposed to the development of IgAN and FSGS in Korean patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16361810 PMCID: PMC2779332 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.6.989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
Allele frequencies of the interleukin-10 promoter region among Korean patients and controls and southern Chinese and U.K. white population
*p=0.026 vs. control, †p=0.006 vs. control.
Haplotype distribution of IL-10 promoter gene in IgAN patients and healthy control
*p=0.006 vs. healthy controls.
Haplotype distribution of IL-10 promoter gene in FSGS patients and healthy control
*p=0.026 vs. healthy controls.
IL-10 genotype frequencies in healthy controls, IgAN and FSGS
*p=0.002 vs. healthy control, †p=0.049 vs. healthy control, ‡p=0.005 vs. healthy control, §p=0.048 vs. healthy control.