Literature DB >> 16360210

Microbial keratitis predisposing factors and morbidity.

Lisa Keay1, Katie Edwards, Thomas Naduvilath, Hugh R Taylor, Grant R Snibson, Kevin Forde, Fiona Stapleton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine predisposing factors, treatment costs, and visual outcome of microbial keratitis in an ophthalmic casualty and inpatient population.
DESIGN: Retrospective medical records review. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen- to 64-year-olds with microbial keratitis treated at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital between May 2001 and April 2003 (n = 291).
METHODS: Risk factors were identified from patient files. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological data; severity; outpatient visits; hospital bed days; and vision loss were examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost to treat (Australian dollars), vision loss, and factors influencing these outcomes.
RESULTS: Ocular trauma (106/291 [36.4%]) and contact lens (CL) wear (98/291 [33.7%]) were the most commonly identified predisposing factors; 18 (6.1%) had multiple predisposing factors; 17 (5.8%), ocular surface disease; 20 (6.9%), herpetic eye disease; 4 (1.4%), systemic associations; 5 (1.7%), other; and 23 (7.9%), unknown cause. Of trauma cases, 90.6% involved males, compared with 44% to 57% for other groups (P<0.001). Contact lens wearers were younger than the other groups--mean age 30 years, compared with 40 to 47 years (P<0.01). Gram-negative organisms were isolated more frequently in CL wearers than trauma cases (18.7% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.01). The number of outpatient visits was 4+/-1 (median +/- interquartile range), and 19.6% (57/291) were hospitalized for 5+/-2 days. Hospital resource use and vision loss were similar for predisposing factors but differed by causative microorganism. Eighty-eight percent of cases were scraped: acanthamoeba keratitis was the most expensive to treat, followed by fungal and herpetic keratitis and, lastly, culture-proven bacterial keratitis or culture-negative cases (P<0.0001). After treatment, 21.7% exhibited >2 lines of vision loss, and 1.6% of cases had > or =10 lines of vision loss. Vision loss was associated with clinical severity (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Ocular trauma and CL wear are the major predisposing factors for microbial keratitis in this age range. These cases require significant hospital resources during treatment, and the keratitis may result in loss of vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360210     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  102 in total

Review 1.  Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: how have epidemiology and genetics helped us with pathogenesis and prophylaxis.

Authors:  F Stapleton; N Carnt
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Dynamics of flagellum- and pilus-mediated association of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with contact lens surfaces.

Authors:  Victoria B Tran; Suzanne M J Fleiszig; David J Evans; Clayton J Radke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  In vivo imaging of corneal inflammation: new tools for clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Dimosthenis Mantopoulos; Andrea Cruzat; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.975

Review 4.  Current state of in vivo confocal microscopy in management of microbial keratitis.

Authors:  Radhika L Kumar; Andrea Cruzat; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.975

5.  Identification of SlpB, a Cytotoxic Protease from Serratia marcescens.

Authors:  Robert M Q Shanks; Nicholas A Stella; Kristin M Hunt; Kimberly M Brothers; Liang Zhang; Patrick H Thibodeau
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Clinical presentation and morbidity of contact lens-associated microbial keratitis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Johan G Hoddenbach; Sharmila S Boekhoorn; Rene Wubbels; Willem Vreugdenhil; Jeroen Van Rooij; Annette J M Geerards
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Characterization of ocular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates belonging predominantly to clonal complex 2 subcluster II.

Authors:  Paulo J M Bispo; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Antonio C C Pignatari
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the ocular surface: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Edoardo Villani; Christophe Baudouin; Nathan Efron; Pedram Hamrah; Takashi Kojima; Sanjay V Patel; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Andrey Zhivov; Murat Dogru
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.424

Review 9.  Dry eye disease and microbial keratitis: is there a connection?

Authors:  Srihari Narayanan; Rachel L Redfern; William L Miller; Kelly K Nichols; Alison M McDermott
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Comparison of contamination rates between preserved and preservative-free fluoroquinolone eyedrops.

Authors:  Mo Sae Kim; Hong Kyun Kim; Joon Mo Kim; Chul Young Choi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.