Literature DB >> 23064697

Comparison of contamination rates between preserved and preservative-free fluoroquinolone eyedrops.

Mo Sae Kim1, Hong Kyun Kim, Joon Mo Kim, Chul Young Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of preservative-free fluoroquinolone products compared with benzalkonium chloride containing fluoroquinolones using the challenge test provided by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and the in-use test.
METHODS: 1. Challenge test: to compare the growth of microorganisms between different fluoroquinolone preparations, four test organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger were chosen among five microorganisms listed by USP 2004. The inoculated products were sampled for microbial survivors at days 7, 14, and 28 following initial inoculation at room temperature. The number of surviving organisms were calculated as a Log10 reduction from the original inocula. 2. In-use test: a total of 100 bottles were collected after instillation of preservative-free fluoroquinolone eyedrops in volunteer patients after 1 week of use. The remaining fluid and tips of the bottles were cultured. Colonies on the plates were counted at the end of the incubation period. All microorganisms were identified by Gram staining and biochemical assays.
RESULTS: 1. Challenge test: preservative-free gatifloxacin and levofloxacin demonstrated a lower log reduction against A. niger than preserved fluoroquinolones and preservative-free moxifloxacin at all time points. 2. In-use test: There was no contamination identified on plates inoculated by preservative-free quinolone bottles after 1 week of use in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should be aware of the lower antifungal preservative effectiveness of some preservative-free fluoroquinolone preparations than preserved ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23064697     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2152-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  19 in total

1.  Microbial keratitis predisposing factors and morbidity.

Authors:  Lisa Keay; Katie Edwards; Thomas Naduvilath; Hugh R Taylor; Grant R Snibson; Kevin Forde; Fiona Stapleton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Benzalkonium chloride toxicity to the human cornea.

Authors:  A R Gasset
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Cytotoxicity of ophthalmic preservatives.

Authors:  A R Gasset; Y Ishii; H E Kaufman; T Miller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Epidemiological features and laboratory results of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a five-year study at a rural tertiary-care hospital in western Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Sachin Deorukhkar; Ruchi Katiyar; Santosh Saini
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Comparison of antifungal efficacies of moxifloxacin, liposomal amphotericin B, and combination treatment in experimental Candida albicans endophthalmitis in rabbits.

Authors:  Yudum Tiftikcioğlu Deren; Sengül Ozdek; Ayşe Kalkanci; Nalan Akyürek; Berati Hasanreisoğlu
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Effects of benzalkonium chloride on growth and survival of Chang conjunctival cells.

Authors:  M De Saint Jean; F Brignole; A F Bringuier; A Bauchet; G Feldmann; C Baudouin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  DNA topoisomerases from pathogenic fungi: targets for the discovery of antifungal drugs.

Authors:  L L Shen; J Baranowski; J Fostel; D A Montgomery; P A Lartey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Fungal keratitis.

Authors:  M Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Comparative pharmacodynamic interaction analysis between ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin and antifungal agents against Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Theodouli Stergiopoulou; Joseph Meletiadis; Tin Sein; Paraskevi Papaioannidou; Ioannis Tsiouris; Emmanuel Roilides; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis.

Authors:  Matthew Green; Andrew Apel; Fiona Stapleton
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  3 in total

1.  Microbial Contamination of Preservative-Free Artificial Tears Based on Instillation Techniques.

Authors:  Jee-Hye Lee; Min-Ji Kang; Ha-Eun Sim; Je-Hyung Hwang
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Estimated deaths and illnesses averted during fungal meningitis outbreak associated with contaminated steroid injections, United States, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Rachel M Smith; Gordana Derado; Matthew Wise; Julie R Harris; Tom Chiller; Martin I Meltzer; Benjamin J Park
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.883

3.  Topical Chlorhexidine 0.2% versus Topical Natamycin 5% for the Treatment of Fungal Keratitis in Nepal: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Jeremy J Hoffman; Reena Yadav; Sandip D Sanyam; Pankaj Chaudhary; Abhishek Roshan; Sanjay K Singh; Sanjay K Singh; Sailesh K Mishra; Simon Arunga; Victor H Hu; David Macleod; Astrid Leck; Matthew J Burton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 14.277

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.