Literature DB >> 16356529

The visual motion detectors underlying ocular following responses in monkeys.

Kenichiro Miura1, Kiyoto Matsuura, Masakatsu Taki, Hiromitsu Tabata, Naoko Inaba, Kenji Kawano, Frederick A Miles.   

Abstract

Psychophysical evidence indicates that visual motion can be sensed by low-level (energy-based) and high-level (feature-based) mechanisms. The present experiments were undertaken to determine which of these mechanisms mediates the initial ocular following response (OFR) that can be elicited at ultra-short latencies by sudden motion of large-field images. We used the methodology of Sheliga, Chen, Fitzgibbon, and Miles (Initial ocular following in humans: A response to first-order motion energy. Vision Research, 2005a), who studied the initial OFRs of humans, to study the initial OFRs of monkeys. Accordingly, we applied horizontal motion to: (1) vertical square-wave gratings lacking the fundamental ("missing fundamental stimulus") and (2) vertical grating patterns consisting of the sum of two sinusoids of frequency 3f and 4f, which created a repeating pattern with beat frequency, f. Both visual stimuli share a critical property: when subject to 1/4-wavelength steps, their overall pattern (feature) shifts in the direction of the steps, whereas their major Fourier component shifts in the reverse direction (because of spatial aliasing). We found that the initial OFRs of monkeys to these stimuli, like those of humans, were always in the opposite direction to the 1/4-wavelength shifts, i.e., in the direction of the major Fourier component, consistent with detection by (low-level) oriented spatio-temporal filters as in the well-known energy model of motion analysis. Our data indicate that the motion detectors mediating the initial OFR have quantitatively similar properties in monkeys and humans, suggesting that monkeys provide a good animal model for the human OFR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16356529      PMCID: PMC2426752          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  44 in total

Review 1.  The role of MST neurons during ocular tracking in 3D space.

Authors:  K Kawano; Y Inoue; A Takemura; Y Kodaka; F A Miles
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.230

2.  Visual motion of missing-fundamental patterns: motion energy versus feature correspondence.

Authors:  R O Brown; S He
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Short-latency ocular following in humans: sensitivity to binocular disparity.

Authors:  G S Masson; C Busettini; D S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update.

Authors:  Z L Lu; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Visually driven eye movements elicited at ultra-short latency are severely impaired by MST lesions.

Authors:  Aya Takemura; Yuka Inoue; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Contrast dependence of response normalization in area MT of the rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Hilary W Heuer; Kenneth H Britten
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Visual cortex neurons of monkeys and cats: temporal dynamics of the contrast response function.

Authors:  Duane G Albrecht; Wilson S Geisler; Robert A Frazor; Alison M Crane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Reversed short-latency ocular following.

Authors:  G S Masson; D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Parallel motion processing for the initiation of short-latency ocular following in humans.

Authors:  Guillaume S Masson; Eric Castet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  19 in total

1.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effects of preceding moving stimuli on the initial part of smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  Masakatsu Taki; Kenichiro Miura; Hiromitsu Tabata; Yasuo Hisa; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors.

Authors:  Y Kodaka; B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Inferring the future target trajectory from visual context: is visual background structure used for anticipatory smooth pursuit?

Authors:  Thomas Eggert; J Ladda; A Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of prolonged viewing of motion on short-latency ocular following responses.

Authors:  Masakatsu Taki; Kenichiro Miura; Hiromitsu Tabata; Yasuo Hisa; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Binocular summation for reflexive eye movements.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The initial disparity vergence elicited with single and dual grating stimuli in monkeys: evidence for disparity energy sensing and nonlinear interactions.

Authors:  K Miura; Y Sugita; K Matsuura; N Inaba; K Kawano; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Difference in perceptual and oculomotor responses revealed by apparent motion stimuli presented with an interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Shizuka Nohara; Kenji Kawano; Kenichiro Miura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): dependence upon the spatial frequency of the stimulus.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; B G Cumming; E J Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.