Literature DB >> 16354744

Numerical modeling of turbulent and laminar airflow and odorant transport during sniffing in the human and rat nose.

Kai Zhao1, Pamela Dalton, Geoffery C Yang, Peter W Scherer.   

Abstract

Human sniffing behavior usually involves bouts of short, high flow rate inhalation (>300 ml/s through each nostril) with mostly turbulent airflow. This has often been characterized as a factor enabling higher amounts of odorant to deposit onto olfactory mucosa than for laminar airflow and thereby aid in olfactory detection. Using computational fluid dynamics human nasal cavity models, however, we found essentially no difference in predicted olfactory odorant flux (g/cm2 s) for turbulent versus laminar flow for total nasal flow rates between 300 and 1000 ml/s and for odorants of quite different mucosal solubility. This lack of difference was shown to be due to the much higher resistance to lateral odorant mass transport in the mucosal nasal airway wall than in the air phase. The simulation also revealed that the increase in airflow rate during sniffing can increase odorant uptake flux to the nasal/olfactory mucosa but lower the cumulative total uptake in the olfactory region when the inspired air/odorant volume was held fixed, which is consistent with the observation that sniff duration may be more important than sniff strength for optimizing olfactory detection. In contrast, in rats, sniffing involves high-frequency bouts of both inhalation and exhalation with laminar airflow. In rat nose odorant uptake simulations, it was observed that odorant deposition was highly dependent on solubility and correlated with the locations of different types of receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16354744     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjj008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  54 in total

1.  Dorsorostral snout muscles in the rat subserve coordinated movement for whisking and sniffing.

Authors:  Sebastian Haidarliu; David Golomb; David Kleinfeld; Ehud Ahissar
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Airflow and nanoparticle deposition in rat nose under various breathing and sniffing conditions: a computational evaluation of the unsteady effect.

Authors:  Jianbo Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.433

Review 3.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Effects of concentration and sniff flow rate on the rat electroolfactogram.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium to retronasal air flow.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill; Maggie Phan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Odorants with multiple oxygen-containing functional groups and other odorants with high water solubility preferentially activate posterior olfactory bulb glomeruli.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Spart Arguello; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 7.  Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 8.  Review of computational fluid dynamics in the assessment of nasal air flow and analysis of its limitations.

Authors:  Maurizio Quadrio; Carlotta Pipolo; Stefano Corti; Riccardo Lenzi; Francesco Messina; Chiara Pesci; Giovanni Felisati
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Differential Impacts of Repeated Sampling on Odor Representations by Genetically-Defined Mitral and Tufted Cell Subpopulations in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The fluid dynamics of canine olfaction: unique nasal airflow patterns as an explanation of macrosmia.

Authors:  Brent A Craven; Eric G Paterson; Gary S Settles
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.