Literature DB >> 32601245

Differential Impacts of Repeated Sampling on Odor Representations by Genetically-Defined Mitral and Tufted Cell Subpopulations in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.

Thomas P Eiting1, Matt Wachowiak2.   

Abstract

Sniffing, the active control of breathing beyond passive respiration, is used by mammals to modulate olfactory sampling. Sniffing allows animals to make odor-guided decisions within ∼200 ms, but animals routinely engage in bouts of high-frequency sniffing spanning several seconds; the impact of such repeated odorant sampling on odor representations remains unclear. We investigated this question in the mouse olfactory bulb (OB), where mitral and tufted cells (MTCs) form parallel output streams of odor information processing. To test the impact of repeated odorant sampling on MTC responses, we used two-photon imaging in anesthetized male and female mice to record activation of MTCs while precisely varying inhalation frequency. A combination of genetic targeting and viral expression of GCaMP6 reporters allowed us to access mitral cell (MC) and superficial tufted cell (sTC) subpopulations separately. We found that repeated odorant sampling differentially affected responses in MCs and sTCs, with MCs showing more diversity than sTCs over the same time period. Impacts of repeated sampling among MCs included both increases and decreases in excitation, as well as changes in response polarity. Response patterns across simultaneously-imaged MCs reformatted over time, with representations of different odorants becoming more distinct. Individual MCs responded differentially to changes in inhalation frequency, whereas sTC responses were more uniform over time and across frequency. Our results support the idea that MCs and TCs comprise functionally distinct pathways for odor information processing, and suggest that the reformatting of MC odor representations by high-frequency sniffing may serve to enhance the discrimination of similar odors.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Repeated sampling of odorants during high-frequency respiration (sniffing) is a hallmark of active odorant sampling by mammals; however, the adaptive function of this behavior remains unclear. We found distinct effects of repeated sampling on odor representations carried by the two main output channels from the mouse olfactory bulb (OB), mitral and tufted cells (MTCs). Mitral cells (MCs) showed more diverse changes in response patterns over time as compared with tufted cells (TCs), leading to odorant representations that were more distinct after repeated sampling. These results support the idea that MTCs contribute different aspects to encoding odor information, and they indicate that MCs (but not TCs) may play a primary role in the modulation of olfactory processing by sampling behavior.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coding; in vivo; mitral cell; odor; sniffing; two-photon imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 32601245      PMCID: PMC7406285          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0258-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  51 in total

1.  Representation of odorants by receptor neuron input to the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  M Wachowiak; L B Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Hippocampal activity, olfaction, and sniffing: an olfactory input to the dentate gyrus.

Authors:  C H Vanderwolf
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-10-16       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Functional organization of sensory input to the olfactory bulb glomerulus analyzed by two-photon calcium imaging.

Authors:  Matt Wachowiak; Winfried Denk; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Coding and synaptic processing of sensory information in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Matt Wachowiak; Michael T Shipley
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 7.727

5.  Transgene expression in target-defined neuron populations mediated by retrograde infection with adeno-associated viral vectors.

Authors:  Markus Rothermel; Daniela Brunert; Christine Zabawa; Marta Díaz-Quesada; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A resource of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Hiroki Taniguchi; Miao He; Priscilla Wu; Sangyong Kim; Raehum Paik; Ken Sugino; Duda Kvitsiani; Duda Kvitsani; Yu Fu; Jiangteng Lu; Ying Lin; Goichi Miyoshi; Yasuyuki Shima; Gord Fishell; Sacha B Nelson; Z Josh Huang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  An intrinsic vasopressin system in the olfactory bulb is involved in social recognition.

Authors:  Vicky A Tobin; Hirofumi Hashimoto; Douglas W Wacker; Yuki Takayanagi; Kristina Langnaese; Celine Caquineau; Julia Noack; Rainer Landgraf; Tatsushi Onaka; Gareth Leng; Simone L Meddle; Mario Engelmann; Mike Ludwig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Sniffing behavior of mice during performance in odor-guided tasks.

Authors:  Daniel W Wesson; Tanya N Donahou; Marc O Johnson; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Mitral and tufted cells differ in the decoding manner of odor maps in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shin Nagayama; Yuji K Takahashi; Yoshihiro Yoshihara; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes.

Authors:  Shiaoching Gong; Chen Zheng; Martin L Doughty; Kasia Losos; Nicholas Didkovsky; Uta B Schambra; Norma J Nowak; Alexandra Joyner; Gabrielle Leblanc; Mary E Hatten; Nathaniel Heintz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Active sensing in a dynamic olfactory world.

Authors:  John Crimaldi; Hong Lei; Andreas Schaefer; Michael Schmuker; Brian H Smith; Aaron C True; Justus V Verhagen; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Mapping odorant sensitivities reveals a sparse but structured representation of olfactory chemical space by sensory input to the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shawn D Burton; Audrey Brown; Thomas P Eiting; Isaac A Youngstrom; Thomas C Rust; Michael Schmuker; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Dynamics of Glutamatergic Drive Underlie Diverse Responses of Olfactory Bulb Outputs In Vivo.

Authors:  Andrew K Moran; Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-04-19

4.  Circuit Contributions to Sensory-Driven Glutamatergic Drive of Olfactory Bulb Mitral and Tufted Cells During Odorant Inhalation.

Authors:  Andrew K Moran; Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.342

5.  Coupling of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons to Fluctuating Odor Pulses.

Authors:  Debanjan Dasgupta; Tom P A Warner; Andrew Erskine; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Generation and Characterization of a Cell Type-Specific, Inducible Cre-Driver Line to Study Olfactory Processing.

Authors:  Anzhelika Koldaeva; Cary Zhang; Yu-Pei Huang; Janine Kristin Reinert; Seiya Mizuno; Fumihiro Sugiyama; Satoru Takahashi; Taha Soliman; Hiroaki Matsunami; Izumi Fukunaga
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.