Literature DB >> 16353193

Surgical technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) needs improvement: a multivariate analysis of 400 patients.

Christoph M Seiler1, Boris E Frohlich, Ulrich J Dorsam, Peter Kienle, Markus W Buchler, Hanns-Peter Knaebel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze factors that may have an impact on the failure rate of the surgical implantation technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) and to assess whether morbidity rates differ between a primarily successful surgical and a secondary Seldinger approach.
METHODS: Four hundred consecutive patients receiving a primary TIAP in local anesthesia were included into this retrospective cohort study. A logistic regression-model was used to evaluate reasons for failure of the TIAP method.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen (79.5%) patients had a successful TIAP procedure, 82 patients were intraoperatively converted to a Seldinger technique. Reasons for failure were: correct positioning impossible n = 54, no or only an undersized vessel for insertion available n = 17, other reasons n = 11. Logistic regression analysis did not reveal any significant factor for failure of the primary surgical approach. In the group with primarily successful TIAP, 8 of 318 patients (3%) developed complications compared to 7 of 82 patients (9%) converted to a Seldinger technique.
CONCLUSION: Failure of the surgical approach for implanting totally implantable access ports is related to insertion and positioning. Conversion to a Seldinger technique results in a higher complication rate. A modified approach for surgical port placement should be considered in order to reduce complications. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16353193     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  20 in total

1.  Cost and Morbidity Analysis of Chest Port Insertion: Interventional Radiology Suite Versus Operating Room.

Authors:  Jennifer R LaRoy; Sarah B White; Thejus Jayakrishnan; Stephanie Dybul; Dirk Ungerer; Kiran Turaga; Parag J Patel
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Femoral Placement of Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports in Patients with Bilateral Breast Cancer.

Authors:  V Almasi-Sperling; S Hieber; J Lermann; O Strahl; M W Beckmann; W Lang; T A Sagban
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Use of totally implantable central venous access port via the basilic vein in patients with thoracic malignancies.

Authors:  Makoto Sonobe; Fengshi Chen; Takuji Fujinaga; Kiyoshi Sato; Tsuyoshi Shoji; Hiroaki Sakai; Ryo Miyahara; Toru Bando; Kenichi Okubo; Toshiki Hirata; Hiroshi Date
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of Central Venous Port Procedures Between Puncture vs. Cut-down and Residents vs. Senior Surgeons.

Authors:  Ryota Otsubo; Hiroshi Yano; Megumi Matsumoto; Aya Tanaka; Takashi Nonaka; Shigekazu Hidaka; Keitaro Matsumoto; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Shuntaro Sato; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 5.  Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Totally implantable venous access devices - 20 years' experience of implantation in cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  T James Royle; Ruth E Davies; Mark X Gannon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Central Venous Port Systems via the Right Internal Jugular Vein: Are Chest X-Ray and/or Fluoroscopy Needed to Confirm the Correct Placement of the Device?

Authors:  Michelangelo Miccini; Diletta Cassini; Matteo Gregori; Sergio Gazzanelli; Simone Cassibba; Daniele Biacchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Totally implantable venous access port insertion via open Seldinger approach of the internal jugular vein-a retrospective risk stratification of 500 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Felix Becker; Lennart A Wurche; Martina Darscht; Andreas Pascher; Benjamin Struecker
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center.

Authors:  Se Jin Ahn; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Jin Wook Chung; Sang Bu An; Yong Hu Yin; Hwan Jun Jae; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  1000 Port-A-Cath ® placements by subclavian vein approach: single surgeon experience.

Authors:  S Mudan; A Giakoustidis; D Morrison; S Iosifidou; R Raobaikady; K Neofytou; J Stebbing
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.