Literature DB >> 16346474

Competition for sulfate and ethanol among desulfobacter, desulfobulbus, and desulfovibrio species isolated from intertidal sediments.

H J Laanbroek1, H J Geerligs, L Sijtsma, H Veldkamp.   

Abstract

Competition for sulfate and ethanol among Desulfobacter, Desulfobulbus, and Desulfovibrio species isolated from estuarine sediments was studied in energy-limited chemostats. Desulfovibrio baculatus was the most successful competitor for limiting amounts of sulfate and ethanol, followed by Desulfobulbus propionicus. The success of Desulfovibrio baculatus was dependent on the availability of sufficient iron. Of the three species studied, Desulfobacter postgatei was the least successful competitor for limiting amounts of sulfate. Although stimulating the growth of Desulfobacter postgatei, addition of Ca-saturated illite particles to culture media did not affect the outcome of competition for sulfate. Thus, under sulfate limitation acetate accumulated. This phenomenon was briefly discussed in relation to the flow of electrons during anaerobic mineralization in marine and estuarine sulfate-limited sediments.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 16346474      PMCID: PMC239669          DOI: 10.1128/aem.47.2.329-334.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  SULPHUR METABOLISM IN THIORHODACEAE. I. QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENTS ON GROWING CELLS OF CHROMATIUM OKENII.

Authors:  H G TRUEPER; H G SCHLEGEL
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1964       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland; S Polcin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Substrates for sulfate reduction and methane production in intertidal sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; D M Ward
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Volatile Fatty acids and hydrogen as substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic marine sediment.

Authors:  J Sørensen; D Christensen; B B Jørgensen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Evidence for coexistence of two distinct functional groups of sulfate-reducing bacteria in salt marsh sediment.

Authors:  I M Banat; E B Lindström; D B Nedwell; M T Balba
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Propionate-Degrading Bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from Methanogenic Ecosystems.

Authors:  D R Boone; M P Bryant
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Estimations of bacterial growth rates in natural waters.

Authors:  H W Jannasch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Methane production in shallow-water, tropical marine sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

9.  Microbial interactions in sediment communities.

Authors:  H J Laanbroek; H Veldkamp
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-06-11       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Oxidation of short-chain fatty acids by sulfate-reducing bacteria in freshwater and in marine sediments.

Authors:  H J Laanbroek; N Pfennig
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.552

View more
  17 in total

1.  Microbial community changes in response to ethanol or methanol amendments for U(VI) reduction.

Authors:  Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya; Craig C Brandt; Andrew S Madden; Meghan M Drake; Joel E Kostka; Denise M Akob; Kirsten Küsel; Anthony V Palumbo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evidence for aceticlastic methanogenesis in the presence of sulfate in a gas condensate-contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  Christopher G Struchtemeyer; Mostafa S Elshahed; Kathleen E Duncan; Michael J McInerney
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influence of Metronidazole, CO, CO(2), and Methanogens on the Fermentative Metabolism of the Anaerobic Fungus Neocallimastix sp. Strain L2.

Authors:  F D Marvin-Sikkema; E Rees; M N Kraak; J C Gottschal; R A Prins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Properties of Desulfovibrio carbinolicus sp. nov. and Other Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Isolated from an Anaerobic-Purification Plant.

Authors:  H J Nanninga; J C Gottschal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Fermentation of Inulin by Clostridium thermosuccinogenes sp. nov., a Thermophilic Anaerobic Bacterium Isolated from Various Habitats.

Authors:  W J Drent; G A Lahpor; W M Wiegant; J C Gottschal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Bacterial periphytic communities related to mercury methylation within aquatic plant roots from a temperate freshwater lake (South-Western France).

Authors:  Sophie Gentès; Julie Taupiac; Yannick Colin; Jean-Marc André; Rémy Guyoneaud
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Growth kinetics and competition--some contemporary comments.

Authors:  J C Gottschal
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 8.  Some reflections on microbial competitiveness among heterotrophic bacteria.

Authors:  J C Gottschal
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.271

9.  Response of the sulfate-reducing community to the re-establishment of estuarine conditions in two contrasting soils: a mesocosm approach.

Authors:  Marzia Miletto; Roos Loeb; A Martjin Antheunisse; Paul L E Bodelier; Hendrikus J Laanbroek
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Sulfate reduction by a syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacterium.

Authors:  B L Van Kuijk; A J Stams
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.