Literature DB >> 16151124

Evidence for aceticlastic methanogenesis in the presence of sulfate in a gas condensate-contaminated aquifer.

Christopher G Struchtemeyer1, Mostafa S Elshahed, Kathleen E Duncan, Michael J McInerney.   

Abstract

The anaerobic metabolism of acetate was studied in sediments and groundwater from a gas condensate-contaminated aquifer in an aquifer where geochemical evidence implicated sulfate reduction and methanogenesis as the predominant terminal electron-accepting processes. Most-probable-number tubes containing acetate and microcosms containing either [2-(14)C]acetate or [U-(14)C]acetate produced higher quantities of CH(4) compared to CO(2) in the presence or absence of sulfate.(14)CH(4) accounted for 70 to 100% of the total labeled gas in the [(14)C]acetate microcosms regardless of whether sulfate was present or not. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of the acetate enrichments both with and without sulfate using Archaea-specific primers showed identical predominant bands that had 99% sequence similarity to members of Methanosaetaceae. Clone libraries containing archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences amplified from sediment from the contaminated portion of the aquifer showed that 180 of the 190 clones sequenced belonged to the Methanosaetaceae. The production of methane and the high frequency of sequences from the Methanosaetaceae in acetate enrichments with and without sulfate indicate that aceticlastic methanogenesis was the predominant fate of acetate at this site even though sulfate-reducing bacteria would be expected to consume acetate in the presence of sulfate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151124      PMCID: PMC1214612          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5348-5353.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  34 in total

1.  Threshold acetate concentrations for acetate catabolism by aceticlastic methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  P Westermann; B K Ahring; R A Mah
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Development of oligonucleotide probes and PCR primers for detecting phylogenetic subgroups of sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  K Daly; R J Sharp; A J McCarthy
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Isolation and Characterization of Acetate-Utilizing Anaerobes from a Freshwater Sediment.

Authors:  J.C.M. Scholten; A.J.M. Stams
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Effects of amendment with ferrihydrite and gypsum on the structure and activity of methanogenic populations in rice field soil.

Authors:  Tillmann Lueders; Michael W Friedrich
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid (HS-CoM)-dependent growth of Methanobacterium ruminantium in a pressureized atmosphere.

Authors:  W E Balch; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of acetate turnover in methanogenic and sulfate-reducing sediments by radiolabeling and stable isotope labeling and by use of specific inhibitors: evidence for isotopic exchange.

Authors:  W de Graaf; P Wellsbury; R J Parkes; T E Cappenberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Phylogenetic and physiological diversity of sulphate-reducing bacteria isolated from a salt marsh sediment.

Authors:  J N Rooney-Varga; B R Genthner; R Devereux; S G Willis; S D Friedman; M E Hines
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 8.  Methane from acetate.

Authors:  J G Ferry
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Characterization of 16S rRNA genes from oil field microbial communities indicates the presence of a variety of sulfate-reducing, fermentative, and sulfide-oxidizing bacteria.

Authors:  G Voordouw; S M Armstrong; M F Reimer; B Fouts; A J Telang; Y Shen; D Gevertz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Isolation of Geobacter species from diverse sedimentary environments.

Authors:  J D Coates; E J Phillips; D J Lonergan; H Jenter; D R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of microbial consortia from a biogenic gas field in Alaska's Cook Inlet basin.

Authors:  Katherine S Dawson; Dariusz Strąpoć; Brad Huizinga; Ulrika Lidstrom; Matt Ashby; Jennifer L Macalady
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Influence of the drilling mud formulation process on the bacterial communities in thermogenic natural gas wells of the Barnett Shale.

Authors:  Christopher G Struchtemeyer; James P Davis; Mostafa S Elshahed
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Changes in Microbial Biofilm Communities during Colonization of Sewer Systems.

Authors:  O Auguet; M Pijuan; J Batista; C M Borrego; O Gutierrez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bioenergy production via microbial conversion of residual oil to natural gas.

Authors:  Lisa M Gieg; Kathleen E Duncan; Joseph M Suflita
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Roles of thermophilic thiosulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea in the biocorrosion of oil pipelines.

Authors:  Renxing Liang; Robert S Grizzle; Kathleen E Duncan; Michael J McInerney; Joseph M Suflita
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Butyrate Conversion by Sulfate-Reducing and Methanogenic Communities from Anoxic Sediments of Aarhus Bay, Denmark.

Authors:  Derya Ozuolmez; Elisha K Moore; Ellen C Hopmans; Jaap S Sinninghe Damsté; Alfons J M Stams; Caroline M Plugge
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.