Literature DB >> 16346402

Interaction of Agromyces ramosus with Other Bacteria in Soil.

L E Casida1.   

Abstract

Agromyces ramosus occurs in very high numbers in most soils and, based on studies of laboratory isolates, does not require host cells for growth. Nevertheless, it attacked and destroyed most of the gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial species tested as possible host organisms. A. ramosus also attacked and destroyed Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The possibility of attack on fungi was unclear. Among the bacteria serving as hosts were the important soil species Azotobacter vinelandii, Rhizobium leguminosarum, Rhizobium meliloti, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Dead cells were not attacked. A. vinelandii cysts were attacked but left unharmed. To some extent, A. vinelandii seemed to survive this attack by encysting. Attack by A. ramosus occurred in natural soil and over a broad range of nutritional levels in laboratory media. The attack did not seem to be a means for obtaining an increased supply of commonly available nutrients. Instead, it seemed to be a means of obtaining something produced, perhaps in small amounts, by a variety of organisms, but not by all organisms. Several types of culture filtrates were tested for activity. The filtrates neither stimulated nor inhibited the growth of A. ramosus or the host organisms. The availability of catalase activity in host organisms did not seem to be involved. It is not known whether the attack by Agromyces ramosus in soil can be manipulated to cause a decrease in numbers of Agrobacterium tumefaciens or other pathogens without simultaneously depressing the numbers of beneficial organisms in this habitat.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 16346402      PMCID: PMC239483          DOI: 10.1128/aem.46.4.881-888.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  10 in total

1.  L-Phase variants of Agromyces ramosus.

Authors:  A H Horwitz; L E Casida
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  ABUNDANT MICROORGANISM IN SOIL.

Authors:  L E CASIDA
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1965-05

3.  Bacterial Predators of Micrococcus luteus in Soil.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Ensifer adhaerens Predatory Activity Against Other Bacteria in Soil, as Monitored by Indirect Phage Analysis.

Authors:  J J Germida; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Predominant Catalase-negative Soil Bacteria. III. Agromyces, gen. n., Microorganisms Intermediary to Actinomyces and Nocardia.

Authors:  W E Gledhill; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-09

6.  Plating isolation of various catalase-negative microorganisms from soil.

Authors:  D P Labeda; C M Hunt; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-02

7.  Interval scanning photomicrography of microbial cell populations.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-01

8.  Cytochrome composition and effect of catalase on growth of Agromyces ramnosus.

Authors:  D Jones; J Watkins; D J Meyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Survival and reversion of a stable L form in soil.

Authors:  A H Horwitz; L E Casida
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Effects of magnesium, calcium, and serum on reversion of stable L-forms.

Authors:  A H Horwitz; L E Casida
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.490

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Synergistic antimicrobial activity of metabolites produced by a nonobligate bacterial predator.

Authors:  Cody C Cain; Dongho Lee; Robert H Waldo; Alexis T Henry; Earl J Casida; Mansukh C Wani; Monroe E Wall; Nicholas H Oberlies; Joseph O Falkinham
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Gram-negative versus gram-positive (actinomycete) nonobligate bacterial predators of bacteria in soil.

Authors:  L R Zeph; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Minireview: Nonobligate bacterial predation of bacteria in soil.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Relation to copper of N-1, a nonobligate bacterial predator.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Response in Soil of Cupriavidus necator and Other Copper-Resistant Bacterial Predators of Bacteria to Addition of Water, Soluble Nutrients, Various Bacterial Species, or Bacillus thuringiensis Spores and Crystals.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Back from the dead; the curious tale of the predatory cyanobacterium Vampirovibrio chlorellavorus.

Authors:  Rochelle M Soo; Ben J Woodcroft; Donovan H Parks; Gene W Tyson; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Unearthing the Ecology of Soil Microorganisms Using a High Resolution DNA-SIP Approach to Explore Cellulose and Xylose Metabolism in Soil.

Authors:  Charles Pepe-Ranney; Ashley N Campbell; Chantal N Koechli; Sean Berthrong; Daniel H Buckley
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Agromyces laixinhei sp. nov. isolated from bat feces in China.

Authors:  Yanpeng Cheng; Yibo Bai; Yuyuan Huang; Jing Yang; Shan Lu; Dong Jin; Ji Pu; Han Zheng; Junqin Li; Ying Huang; Suping Wang; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.902

9.  Prokaryotes in Subsoil-Evidence for a Strong Spatial Separation of Different Phyla by Analysing Co-occurrence Networks.

Authors:  Marie Uksa; Michael Schloter; David Endesfelder; Susanne Kublik; Marion Engel; Timo Kautz; Ulrich Köpke; Doreen Fischer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  Antibiotics from predatory bacteria.

Authors:  Juliane Korp; María S Vela Gurovic; Markus Nett
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.883

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.