Literature DB >> 16345566

Bacterial Predators of Micrococcus luteus in Soil.

L E Casida1.   

Abstract

Micrococcus luteus cells died relatively rapidly when they were added to natural soil. Microscopic observation showed that the cells were being physically destroyed by bacterial predators in the soil. Two of these predators were responsible for the initial, main attack, and they were isolated. The isolates on laboratory media lysed M. luteus cells in a manner similar to the attacks that occurred in soil. Neither predator was obligate, however, nor were they nutritionally fastidious. One of these bacteria produced mycelium and conidia. Under nutritionally poor conditions it used slender filaments of mycelium to seek out host cells. It had at least some of the characteristics of a Streptoverticillium species. The other bacterium was a short, gram-negative rod that did not easily fit into any of the known groups of gram-negative bacteria. It attached to host cells, but its mechanism of lysing these cells is not known.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 16345566      PMCID: PMC291471          DOI: 10.1128/aem.39.5.1035-1041.1980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  7 in total

1.  Attachment to autoclaved soil of bacterial cells from pure cultures of soil isolates.

Authors:  D L Balkwill; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Death of Micrococcus luteus in Soil.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Further evidence for the regulation of bacterial populations in soil by protozoa.

Authors:  M Habte; M Alexander
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1977-06-20       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Release of microorganisms from soil with respect to transmission electron microscopy viewing and plate counts.

Authors:  D L Balkwill; T E Rucinsky; L E Casida
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Observation of microorganisms in soil and other natural habitats.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-12

6.  Minute tubular forms in soil.

Authors:  L E Casida; K C Liu
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Arthrobacter globiformis and Its Bacteriophage in Soil.

Authors:  L E Casida; K C Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-12
  7 in total
  17 in total

1.  Quantitative Analysis of Lysobacter Predation.

Authors:  Ivana Seccareccia; Christian Kost; Markus Nett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Gram-negative versus gram-positive (actinomycete) nonobligate bacterial predators of bacteria in soil.

Authors:  L R Zeph; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Rate of bacterial mortality in aquatic environments.

Authors:  P Servais; G Billen; J V Rego
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Technique for Estimating Low Numbers of a Bacterial Strain(s) in Soil.

Authors:  N S Makkar; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Minireview: Nonobligate bacterial predation of bacteria in soil.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Interaction of Agromyces ramosus with Other Bacteria in Soil.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Competitive ability and survival in soil of pseudomonas strain 679-2, a dominant, nonobligate bacterial predator of bacteria.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Study of Bacillus subtilis Endospores in Soil by Use of a Modified Endospore Stain.

Authors:  D A Mormak; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Ensifer adhaerens Predatory Activity Against Other Bacteria in Soil, as Monitored by Indirect Phage Analysis.

Authors:  J J Germida; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Deciphering the hunting strategy of a bacterial wolfpack.

Authors:  James E Berleman; John R Kirby
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 16.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.