| Literature DB >> 27242725 |
Charles Pepe-Ranney1, Ashley N Campbell1, Chantal N Koechli1, Sean Berthrong2, Daniel H Buckley1.
Abstract
We explored microbial contributions to decomposition using a sophisticated approach to DNA Stable Isotope Probing (SIP). Our experiment evaluated the dynamics and ecological characteristics of functionally defined microbial groups that metabolize labile and structural C in soils. We added to soil a complex amendment representing plant derivedEntities:
Keywords: DNA-SIP; carbon cycle; cellulose; decomposition; soil; stable isotope probing; trophic; verrucomicrobia
Year: 2016 PMID: 27242725 PMCID: PMC4867679 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Distinct dynamics of metabolization are observed for . Symbols indicate the percentage of added 13C that remains in soil over time. Soils were pooled (three samples per time point per treatment) prior to measuring 13C-content. The bars indicate enumerate OTUs found by SIP to assimilate 13C into DNA (i.e., counts of xylose and cellulose responders) over time (days 1, 3, 7, 14, 30 for xylose, and days 3, 7, 14, 30 for cellulose). Note that 13C lost from soil must be lost in gaseous form, and that 13C that remains in soil may be either unmetabolized, transformed into a new chemical form, or assimilated into microbial biomass.
Figure 2NMDS ordination of SSU rRNA gene sequence composition in gradient fractions shows that variation between fractions is correlated with fraction density, isotopic labeling, and time. Dissimilarity in SSU rRNA gene sequence composition was quantified using the weighted UniFrac metric. SSU rRNA gene sequences were surveyed in twenty gradient fractions at each sampling point for each treatment (Figure S1). 13C-labeling of DNA is apparent because the SSU rRNA gene sequence composition of gradient fractions from 13C and control treatments differ at high density. Each point on the NMDS plot represents one gradient fraction. The size of each point is positively correlated with density and colors indicate the treatment (A) or day (B).
Figure 3Enrichment of OTUs in either . Each point indicates the LFC for a single OTU. High enrichment values indicate an OTU is likely 13C-labeled. Different colors represent different phyla and different panels represent different days. The final column shows the frequency distribution of LFC values in each row. Within each panel, shaded areas are used to indicate one standard deviation (dark shading) or two standard deviations (light shading) about the mean of all LFC values.
Figure 4Phylogenetic position of cellulose responders and xylose responders in the context of all OTUs that passed sparsity independent filtering criteria (see Methods). Only those phyla that contain responders are shown. Colored dots are used to identify xylose responders (green) and cellulose responders (blue). The heatmaps indicate enrichment in high density fractions relative to control (represented as LFC) for each OTU in response to both 13C-cellulose (13CCPS, leftmost heatmap) and 13C-xylose (13CXPS, rightmost heatmap) with values for different days in each heatmap column. High enrichment values (represented as LFC) provide evidence of 13C-labeled DNA.
Figure 5Xylose reponders in the . The left column shows counts of 13C-xylose responders in the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria at days 1, 3, 7, and 30. The right panel shows OTU enrichment in high density gradient fractions (gray points, expressed as fold change) for responders as well as a boxplot for the distribution of fold change values [The box extends one interquartile range, whiskers extend 1.5 times the IR, and small dots are outliers (i.e., beyond 1.5 times the IR)]. Each day in the right column shows all responders (i.e., OTUs that responded to xylose at any point in time). High enrichment values indicates OTU DNA is likely 13C-labeled.
Figure 6Raw data from individual responders highlighted in the main text (see Results). The left column shows OTU relative abundance in density gradient fractions for the indicated treatment pair at each sampling point. Time is indicated by the line color (see legend). Gradient profiles are shaded to represent the different treatments where orange represents “control,” blue “13C-cellulose,” and green “13C-xylose.” The right column shows the relative abundance of each OTU in non-fractionated DNA. Enrichment in the high density fractions of 13C-treatments indicates an OTU likely has 13C-labeled DNA.
Figure 7Change in relative abundance in non-fractionated DNA over time for xylose responders (13CXPS) and cellulose responders (13CCPS). Each panel represents a responders to the indicated substrate [i.e., cellulose (13CCPS) or xylose (13CXPS)] within the indicated phylum except for the lower right panel which shows all reponders to both xylose and celluose. The abbreviations Proteo., Verruco., and Plancto., correspond to Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Planctomycetes, respectively.
Figure 8Characteristics of xylose responders (green) and cellulose responders (blue) based on estimated . The estimated rrn copy number of all responders is shown vs. time (A). Kernel density histogram of values shows cellulose responders had higher average than xylose responders indicating higher average atom % 13C in OTU DNA (B). The final panel indicates the rank relative abundance of all OTUs observed in the non-fractionated DNA (C) where rank was determined at day 1 (bold line) and relative abundance for each OTU is indicated for all days by colored lines (see legend). Xylose responders (green ticks) have higher relative abundance in non-fractionated DNA than cellulose responders (blue ticks). All ticks are based on day 1 relative abundance.