Literature DB >> 16345825

Role of sulfate reduction versus methanogenesis in terminal carbon flow in polluted intertidal sediment of waimea inlet, nelson, new zealand.

D O Mountfort1, R A Asher.   

Abstract

An investigation of the terminal anaerobic processes occurring in polluted intertidal sediments indicated that terminal carbon flow was mainly mediated by sulfate-reducing organisms in sediments with high sulfate concentrations (>10 mM in the interstitial water) exposed to low loadings of nutrient (equivalent to <10 kg of N . day) and biochemical oxygen demand (<0.7 x 10 kg . day) in effluents from different pollution sources. However, in sediments exposed to high loadings of nutrient (>10 kg of N . day) and biochemical oxygen demand (>0.7 x 10 kg . day), methanogenesis was the major process in the mediation of terminal carbon flow, and sulfate concentrations were low (</=2 mM). The respiratory index [CO(2)/(CO(2) + CH(4))] for [2-C]acetate catabolism, a measure of terminal carbon flow, was >/=0.96 for sediment with high sulfate, but in sediments with sulfate as little as 10 muM in the interstitial water, respiratory index values of </=0.22 were obtained. In the latter sediment, methane production rates as high as 3 mumol . g (dry weight) . h were obtained, and there was a potential for active sulfate reduction.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 16345825      PMCID: PMC243999          DOI: 10.1128/aem.42.2.252-258.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  11 in total

1.  Growth of desulfovibrio in lactate or ethanol media low in sulfate in association with H2-utilizing methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  M P Bryant; L L Campbell; C A Reddy; M R Crabill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Carbon and electron flow in mud and sandflat intertidal sediments at delaware inlet, nelson, new zealand.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; R A Asher; E L Mays; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Triton X-100 scintillant for carbon-14 labelled materials.

Authors:  J C Turner
Journal:  Int J Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1968-07

Review 4.  Recent advances in the study of the sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  J R Postgate
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1965-12

5.  Kinetics of acetate metabolism during sludge digestion.

Authors:  P H Smith; R A Mah
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1966-05

6.  Hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenesis and sulphate reduction in anaerobic saltmarsh sediment.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Microbial methanogenesis and acetate metabolism in a meromictic lake.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  A new anaerobic, sporing, acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium, Desulfotomaculum (emend.) acetoxidans.

Authors:  F Widdel; N Pfennig
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1977-02-04       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Changes in proportions of acetate and carbon dioxide used as methane precursors during the anaerobic digestion of bovine waste.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; R A Asher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  13 in total

1.  Distribution of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic aggregates determined by microsensor and molecular analyses.

Authors:  C M Santegoeds; L R Damgaard; G Hesselink; J Zopfi; P Lens; G Muyzer; D de Beer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Microbial community structures in anoxic freshwater lake sediment along a metal contamination gradient.

Authors:  Heidi L Gough; David A Stahl
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Isolation and Characterization of a Methylotrophic Marine Methanogen, Methanococcoides methylutens gen. nov., sp. nov.

Authors:  K R Sowers; J G Ferry
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland; S Polcin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effects of metals on methanogenesis, sulfate reduction, carbon dioxide evolution, and microbial biomass in anoxic salt marsh sediments.

Authors:  D G Capone; D D Reese; R P Kiene
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Methanosarcina acetivorans sp. nov., an Acetotrophic Methane-Producing Bacterium Isolated from Marine Sediments.

Authors:  K R Sowers; S F Baron; J G Ferry
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Competition for sulfate and ethanol among desulfobacter, desulfobulbus, and desulfovibrio species isolated from intertidal sediments.

Authors:  H J Laanbroek; H J Geerligs; L Sijtsma; H Veldkamp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Kinetic analysis of competition between sulfate reducers and methanogens for hydrogen in sediments.

Authors:  D R Lovley; D F Dwyer; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Partitioning effects during terminal carbon and electron flow in sediments of a low-salinity meltwater pond near Bratina Island, McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; H F Kaspar; M Downes; R A Asher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Sulphate reducing bacteria and hydrogen metabolism in the human large intestine.

Authors:  G R Gibson; G T Macfarlane; J H Cummings
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.