Literature DB >> 1634572

Clinical determination of femoral anteversion. A comparison with established techniques.

P A Ruwe1, J R Gage, M B Ozonoff, P A DeLuca.   

Abstract

We evaluated femoral anteversion preoperatively in fifty-nine patients (ninety-one hips), using a clinical method that we developed, Magilligan radiographs, and computed tomographic scans. These measurements were then compared with values for anteversion that were obtained intraoperatively. To determine femoral anteversion clinically, the patient was placed in the prone position and the maximum lateral trochanteric prominence was related to the degree of internal rotation of the hip. Compared with computed tomographic scanning and Magilligan radiographic determination, the clinically determined anteversion correlated most closely (to within 4 degrees) with the amount measured at the time of the operation. The clinical method was found to be superior to radiographic techniques for determination of the degree of femoral anteversion in children who have not had a previous operation about the hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1634572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  47 in total

1.  Measuring physiological and pathological femoral anteversion using a biplanar low-dose X-ray system: validity, reliability, and discriminative ability in cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Matthias Thépaut; Sylvain Brochard; Julien Leboucher; Mathieu Lempereur; Eric Stindel; Valentin Tissot; Bhushan S Borotikar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Three-dimensional biplanar radiography as a new means of accessing femoral version: a comparitive study of EOS three-dimensional radiography versus computed tomography.

Authors:  M Lucius Pomerantz; Diana Glaser; Josh Doan; Sita Kumar; Eric W Edmonds
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Seung Hoon Oh; Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Taek Rim Yoon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Assessment and evaluation of predisposing factors to anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  C M Bonci
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  A musculoskeletal profile of elite female soccer players.

Authors:  Theresa A Chiaia; Robert A Maschi; Robyn M Stuhr; Jennifer R Rogers; Monique A Sheridan; Lisa R Callahan; Jo A Hannafin
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-03-17

6.  Combined supracondylar femoral derotation osteotomy and patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation and severe femoral anteversion syndrome: surgical technique and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Manfred Nelitz; Jens Dreyhaupt; Sean Robert March Williams; Daniel Dornacher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A three-dimensional axis for the study of femoral neck orientation.

Authors:  Noémie Bonneau; Paul-Antoine Libourel; Caroline Simonis; Laurent Puymerail; Michel Baylac; Christine Tardieu; Olivier Gagey
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Structure, sex, and strength and knee and hip kinematics during landing.

Authors:  Jennifer S Howard; Melisa A Fazio; Carl G Mattacola; Timothy L Uhl; Cale A Jacobs
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Determinants of Hip Displacement in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Chia Hsieh Chang; Ying Chih Wang; Pei Chi Ho; Ai Wen Hwang; Hsuan Kai Kao; Wei Chun Lee; Wen E Yang; Ken N Kuo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Identifying relationships among lower extremity alignment characteristics.

Authors:  Anh-Dung Nguyen; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.