Literature DB >> 16345565

Death of Micrococcus luteus in Soil.

L E Casida1.   

Abstract

Micrococcus luteus cells died relatively quickly when they were added to natural soil. The results were similar for soil in nature and as soil samples in the laboratory. The cells died more quickly when nutrients were added to the soil. Those cells that survived soil residence exhibited a temporary lengthening of the time required for colonial growth and pigment formation on laboratory media. They had not gained increased survival capability, however. This was evident when they were retested in soil. Good survival of the M. luteus cells was noted when the soil was incubated at lowered temperatures. Some protection to the cells was provided by slow drying of the soil during incubation or by addition of NaCl. Microscopic examination of the soil revealed that the M. luteus cells were being physically destroyed and that two different bacteria were growing in the areas where the cells had lysed. It was suggested that bacterial predators in the soil might be associated with the death of the M. luteus cells.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 16345565      PMCID: PMC291470          DOI: 10.1128/aem.39.5.1031-1034.1980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  8 in total

1.  Bacterial Predators of Micrococcus luteus in Soil.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Further evidence for the regulation of bacterial populations in soil by protozoa.

Authors:  M Habte; M Alexander
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1977-06-20       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Duration of viability and the growth and expiration rates of group E streptococci in soil.

Authors:  J A Schmitz; L D Olson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-02

4.  Escherichia coli die-out from normal soil as related to nutrient availability and the indigenous microflora.

Authors:  D A Klein; L E Casida
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Observation of microorganisms in soil and other natural habitats.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-12

6.  A note on the differential response of arthrobacter spp. and pseudomonas spp. to drying in soil.

Authors:  J B Robinson; P O Salonius; F E Chase
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Colonization of soil by Arthrobacter and Pseudomonas under varying conditions of water and nutrient availability as studied by plate counts and transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  D P Labeda; K C Liu; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Studies on the endogenous metabolism and senescence of starved Sarcina lutea.

Authors:  I G Burleigh; E A Dawes
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.857

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Gram-negative versus gram-positive (actinomycete) nonobligate bacterial predators of bacteria in soil.

Authors:  L R Zeph; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Minireview: Nonobligate bacterial predation of bacteria in soil.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Bacterial Predators of Micrococcus luteus in Soil.

Authors:  L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Ensifer adhaerens Predatory Activity Against Other Bacteria in Soil, as Monitored by Indirect Phage Analysis.

Authors:  J J Germida; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Role of resistance to starvation in bacterial survival in sewage and lake water.

Authors:  J L Sinclair; M Alexander
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.792

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.