Literature DB >> 16343366

Imaging in head and neck cancer.

Zoran Rumboldt1, Leonie Gordon, Leonie Gordon, Rick Bonsall, Susan Ackermann.   

Abstract

The goals of imaging in head and neck cancer are to establish tumor extent and size, to assess nodal disease, to evaluate for perineural tumor spread, and to distinguish recurrent tumor from post-treatment changes. MRI is the preferred modality for assessment of nasopharyngeal, sinonasal, and parotid tumors, because of better contrast resolution, high frequency of perineural spread, and less prominent motion artifacts. MRI is the best modality to delineate the extent of intraorbital and intracranial extension of malignant tumors. Tumors of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx are frequently primarily imaged with CT, which is less affected by breathing and swallowing artifacts. MRI is also the initial study of choice for tumors confined to the oral tongue, and possibly also for other oral cavity locations because MRI is superior in detection of tumor spread into the bone marrow. There is no clear advantage of CT or MRI for evaluation of nodal disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) is very sensitive for metastatic lymph nodes that are at least 8 mm in size and is the technique of choice in dubious cases. Imaging-guided biopsies are performed whenever needed. For imaging of treated head and neck cancer, PET scans have been found to generally offer higher sensitivity than MRI or CT. Combined PET/CT may be the modality of choice because it almost completely eliminates the false-positive and false-negative PET findings. Patients with head and neck cancer who are referred to tertiary care centers commonly arrive with cross-sectional images obtained at other institutions. Reinterpretation of these studies by dedicated radiologists frequently leads to changes in findings, which alter treatment and affect prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16343366     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-006-0029-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  60 in total

1.  CT detection of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Authors:  S K Mukherji; D L Isaacs; A Creager; W Shockley; M Weissler; D Armao
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Earring lesions of the parotid tail.

Authors:  Bronwyn E Hamilton; Karen L Salzman; Richard H Wiggins; H Ric Harnsberger
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Role of 18FFDG PET/CT in the treatment of head and neck cancers: posttherapy evaluation and pitfalls.

Authors:  Vibhu Kapoor; Melanie B Fukui; Barry M McCook
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Perfusion CT for head and neck tumors: pilot study.

Authors:  Zoran Rumboldt; Riyadh Al-Okaili; John P Deveikis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Dynamic helical CT of T1 and T2 glottic carcinomas: predictive value for local control with radiation therapy.

Authors:  R Murakami; M Furusawa; Y Baba; R Nishimura; F Katsura; M Eura; K Masuyama; M Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  FDG PET studies during treatment: prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Eva Brun; Elisabeth Kjellén; Jan Tennvall; Tomas Ohlsson; Anders Sandell; Roland Perfekt; Roland Perfekt; Johan Wennerberg; Sven Erik Strand
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting absence of fixation of head and neck cancer to the prevertebral space.

Authors:  Wendy C Hsu; Laurie A Loevner; Ronit Karpati; Tabassum Ahmed; Andrew Mong; Madhavi L Battineni; David M Yousem; Kathleen T Montone; Gregory S Weinstein; Randal S Weber; Ara A Chalian
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Carotid artery invasion by head and neck masses: prediction with MR imaging.

Authors:  D M Yousem; H Hatabu; R W Hurst; H M Seigerman; K T Montone; G S Weinstein; R E Hayden; A N Goldberg; D C Bigelow; M J Kotapka
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of mandibular involvement in oral-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Andrea Bolzoni; Johnny Cappiello; Cesare Piazza; Giorgio Peretti; Roberto Maroldi; Davide Farina; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-07

10.  Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US.

Authors:  Ann D King; Gary M K Tse; Anil T Ahuja; Edmund H Y Yuen; Alexander C Vlantis; Edward W H To; Andrew C van Hasselt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Advances in laryngeal imaging.

Authors:  Antanas Verikas; Virgilijus Uloza; Marija Bacauskiene; Adas Gelzinis; Edgaras Kelertas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Syphilis manifesting as a nasopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical lymphadenopathy: A case report.

Authors:  Xinbin Pan; Xiaodong Zhu; Qingdi Quentin Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  The "new" head and neck cancer patient-young, nonsmoker, nondrinker, and HPV positive: evaluation.

Authors:  Daniel G Deschler; Jeremy D Richmon; Samir S Khariwala; Robert L Ferris; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Computed tomography features of the major salivary glands after radioactive iodine ablation in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Thyroid cartilage invasion in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Mario Koopmann; Daniel Weiss; Matthias Steiger; Sandra Elges; Claudia Rudack; Markus Stenner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: value of imaging studies.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 7.  Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis of head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Sun; B Li; C J Li; Y Li; F Su; Q H Gao; F L Wu; T Yu; L Wu; L J Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Surgical errors and risks - the head and neck cancer patient.

Authors:  Ulrich Harréus
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

9.  Diagnostic value of retrospective PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Denys J Loeffelbein; Michael Souvatzoglou; Veronika Wankerl; Julia Dinges; Lucas M Ritschl; Thomas Mücke; Anja Pickhard; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Open cervical lymph node biopsy for head and neck cancers: any benefit?

Authors:  Adeyi A Adoga; Olugbenga A Silas; Tonga L Nimkur
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.