Literature DB >> 15627263

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting absence of fixation of head and neck cancer to the prevertebral space.

Wendy C Hsu1, Laurie A Loevner, Ronit Karpati, Tabassum Ahmed, Andrew Mong, Madhavi L Battineni, David M Yousem, Kathleen T Montone, Gregory S Weinstein, Randal S Weber, Ara A Chalian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the preoperative accuracy of preservation of the retropharyngeal fat plane on magnetic resonance (MR) images in predicting the absence of fixation or extension of head and neck carcinomas to the prevertebral space.
METHODS: The MR images of 75 patients with T3 or T4 primary pharyngeal or laryngeal cancers seen over a 5-year period and treated at our Head and Neck Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. The MR images were independently and blindly evaluated by two head and neck radiologists for preservation of the retropharyngeal fat plane between the tumor and prevertebral musculature. In cases in which the fat was preserved, the prevertebral muscle complex was assessed for the presence of T2 hyperintensity and enhancement. All patients underwent panendoscopy, surgery, or both.
RESULTS: Forty of 75 patients had preservation of the retropharyngeal fat plane between the tumor and the prevertebral compartment on T1-weighted images. In all 40 cases, the prevertebral muscles had a normal appearance on T2-weighted and enhanced MR images. Intraoperative assessment revealed absence of fixation of tumor to the prevertebral fascia in 39 of 40 cases, and these tumors were resectable.
CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced head and neck carcinomas, preservation of the fat between the tumor and the prevertebral musculature on unenhanced T1-weighted images reliably predicts absence of prevertebral space fixation. 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15627263     DOI: 10.1002/hed.20128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  9 in total

Review 1.  Resectability issues with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  D M Yousem; K Gad; R P Tufano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Head and neck cancer: how imaging predicts treatment outcome.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 3.  The emerging potential of magnetic resonance imaging in personalizing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: an oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Kee H Wong; Rafal Panek; Shreerang A Bhide; Christopher M Nutting; Kevin J Harrington; Katie L Newbold
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Gd-DOTA administration at MRI in children younger than 18 months of age: immediate adverse reactions.

Authors:  Sophie Emond; Francis Brunelle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-07-24

Review 5.  Staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: value of imaging studies.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 6.  Imaging in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Zoran Rumboldt; Leonie Gordon; Leonie Gordon; Rick Bonsall; Susan Ackermann
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-01

7.  Oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  Prognostic factors in advanced pharyngeal and oral cavity cancer; significance of multimodality imaging in terms of 7th edition of TNM.

Authors:  Maria Gődény
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Current oncologic concepts and emerging techniques for imaging of head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Maliha Sadick; Stefan O Schoenberg; Karl Hoermann; Haneen Sadick
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-12-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.