Literature DB >> 16341221

Dosage compensation of the active X chromosome in mammals.

Di Kim Nguyen1, Christine M Disteche.   

Abstract

Monosomy of the X chromosome owing to divergence between the sex chromosomes leads to dosage compensation mechanisms to restore balanced expression between the X and the autosomes. In Drosophila melanogaster, upregulation of the male X leads to dosage compensation. It has been hypothesized that mammals likewise upregulate their active X chromosome. Together with X inactivation, this mechanism would maintain balanced expression between the X chromosome and autosomes and between the sexes. Here, we show that doubling of the global expression level of the X chromosome leads to dosage compensation in somatic tissues from several mammalian species. X-linked genes are highly expressed in brain tissues, consistent with a role in cognitive functions. Furthermore, the X chromosome is expressed but not upregulated in spermatids and secondary oocytes, preserving balanced expression of the genome in these haploid cells. Upon fertilization, upregulation of the active X must occur to achieve the observed dosage compensation in early embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16341221     DOI: 10.1038/ng1705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  225 in total

1.  The end of gonad-centric sex determination in mammals.

Authors:  Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Claims and counterclaims of X-chromosome compensation.

Authors:  James A Birchler
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 3.  The origin and evolution of vertebrate sex chromosomes and dosage compensation.

Authors:  A M Livernois; J A M Graves; P D Waters
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Relative overexpression of X-linked genes in mouse embryonic stem cells is consistent with Ohno's hypothesis.

Authors:  Hong Lin; John A Halsall; Philipp Antczak; Laura P O'Neill; Francesco Falciani; Bryan M Turner
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Evidence for dosage compensation between the X chromosome and autosomes in mammals.

Authors:  Peter V Kharchenko; Ruibin Xi; Peter J Park
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  The sex-specific region of sex chromosomes in animals and plants.

Authors:  Andrea R Gschwend; Laura A Weingartner; Richard C Moore; Ray Ming
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Expression reduction in mammalian X chromosome evolution refutes Ohno's hypothesis of dosage compensation.

Authors:  Fangqin Lin; Ke Xing; Jianzhi Zhang; Xionglei He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sex bias and dosage compensation in the zebra finch versus chicken genomes: general and specialized patterns among birds.

Authors:  Yuichiro Itoh; Kirstin Replogle; Yong-Hwan Kim; Juli Wade; David F Clayton; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Strong purifying selection at genes escaping X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Chungoo Park; Laura Carrel; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.