Literature DB >> 16339005

Phase-locked responses to pure tones in the inferior colliculus.

Liang-Fa Liu1, Alan R Palmer, Mark N Wallace.   

Abstract

In the auditory system, some ascending pathways preserve the precise timing information present in a temporal code of frequency. This can be measured by studying responses that are phase-locked to the stimulus waveform. At each stage along a pathway, there is a reduction in the upper frequency limit of the phase-locking and an increase in the steady-state latency. In the guinea pig, phase-locked responses to pure tones have been described at various levels from auditory nerve to neocortex but not in the inferior colliculus (IC). Therefore we made recordings from 161 single units in guinea pig IC. Of these single units, 68% (110/161) showed phase-locked responses. Cells that phase-locked were mainly located in the central nucleus but also occurred in the dorsal cortex and external nucleus. The upper limiting frequency of phase-locking varied greatly between units (80-1,034 Hz) and between anatomical divisions. The upper limits in the three divisions were central nucleus, >1,000 Hz; dorsal cortex, 700 Hz; external nucleus, 320 Hz. The mean latencies also varied and were central nucleus, 8.2 +/- 2.8 (SD) ms; dorsal cortex, 17.2 ms; external nucleus, 13.3 ms. We conclude that many cells in the central nucleus receive direct inputs from the brain stem, whereas cells in the external and dorsal divisions receive input from other structures that may include the forebrain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16339005     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00497.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Viorica Marian; Anthony Shook; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Receptive field dimensionality increases from the auditory midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neurons with stereotyped and rapid responses provide a reference frame for relative temporal coding in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Romain Brasselet; Stefano Panzeri; Nikos K Logothetis; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

Review 6.  Bats and frogs and animals in between: evidence for a common central timing mechanism to extract periodicity pitch.

Authors:  James A Simmons; Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Preservation of spectrotemporal tuning between the nucleus laminaris and the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The dynamical response properties of neocortical neurons to temporally modulated noisy inputs in vitro.

Authors:  Harold Köndgen; Caroline Geisler; Stefano Fusi; Xiao-Jing Wang; Hans-Rudolf Lüscher; Michele Giugliano
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.