Literature DB >> 16338995

Dissociated hysteresis of static ocular counterroll in humans.

A Palla1, C J Bockisch, O Bergamin, D Straumann.   

Abstract

In stationary head roll positions, the eyes are cyclodivergent. We asked whether this phenomenon can be explained by a static hysteresis that differs between the eyes contra- (CE) and ipsilateral (IE) to head roll. Using a motorized turntable, healthy human subjects (n = 8) were continuously rotated about the earth-horizontal naso-occipital axis. Starting from the upright position, a total of three full rotations at a constant velocity (2 degrees/s) were completed (acceleration = 0.05 degrees/s2, velocity plateau reached after 40 s). Subjects directed their gaze on a flashing laser dot straight ahead (switched on 20 ms every 2 s). Binocular three-dimensional eye movements were recorded with dual search coils that were modified (wires exiting inferiorly) to minimize torsional artifacts by the eyelids. A sinusoidal function with a first and second harmonic was fitted to torsional eye position as a function of torsional whole body position at constant turntable velocity. The amplitude and phase of the first harmonic differed significantly between the two eyes (paired t-test: P < 0.05): on average, counterroll amplitude of IE was larger [CE: 6.6 +/- 1.6 degrees (SD); IE: 8.1 +/- 1.7 degrees), whereas CE showed more position lag relative to the turntable (CE: 12.5 +/- 10.7 degrees; IE: 5.1 +/- 8.7 degrees). We conclude that cyclodivergence observed during static ocular counterroll is mainly a result of hysteresis that depends on whether eyes are contra- or ipsilateral to head roll. Static hysteresis also explains the phenomenon of residual torsion, i.e., an incomplete torsional return of the eyes when the first 360 degrees whole body rotation was completed and subjects were back in upright position (extorsion of CE: 2.0 +/- 0.10 degrees; intorsion of IE: 1.4 +/- 0.10 degrees). A computer model that includes asymmetric backlash for each eye can explain dissociated torsional hysteresis during quasi-static binocular counterroll. We hypothesize that ocular torsional hysteresis is introduced at the level of the otolith pathways because the direction-dependent torsional position lag of the eyes is related to the head roll position and not the eye position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16338995     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01014.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Effects of age, viewing distance and target complexity on static ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Joanne C Y Leung; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Khaled Abuhaleeqa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Antihysteresis of perceived longitudinal body axis during continuous quasi-static whole-body rotation in the earth-vertical roll plane.

Authors:  M Tatalias; C J Bockisch; G Bertolini; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Age-related reweighting of visual and vestibular cues for vertical perception.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatiotopic coding during dynamic head tilt.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mikellidou; Marco Turi; David C Burr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A Direct Comparison of Theta Power and Frequency to Speed and Acceleration.

Authors:  Jack P Kennedy; Yuchen Zhou; Y Qin; Sarah D Lovett; A Sheremet; S N Burke; A P Maurer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.

Authors:  Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Dissociating vestibular and somatosensory contributions to spatial orientation.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Luc P J Selen; Giovanni Bertolini; Dominik Straumann; W Pieter Medendorp; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Vestibulo-cerebellar disease impairs the central representation of self-orientation.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Aasef G Shaikh; Antonella Palla; Dominik Straumann; Sarah Marti
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  The effects of lateral head tilt on ocular astigmatic axis.

Authors:  Hamid Fesharaki; Ahmad Azizzadeh; Seyyed Mohamad Ghoreishi; Mohamad Fasihi; Sajjad Badiei; Leila Rezaei
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.