Literature DB >> 19409919

Effects of age, viewing distance and target complexity on static ocular counterroll.

Herbert C Goltz1, Giuseppe Mirabella, Joanne C Y Leung, Alan W Blakeman, Linda Colpa, Khaled Abuhaleeqa, Agnes M F Wong.   

Abstract

The ocular counterroll (OCR) reflex generates partially compensatory torsional eye movements during static head roll tilt. We assessed the influence of age, viewing distance and target complexity on the OCR across the age span (13-63 years; n=47), by recording eye movements during head-on-body roll tilt (0+/-40 degrees in 5 degrees steps) while subjects viewed simple vs. complex targets at 0.33 and 1m. We found that subjects > or = 31 years had lower gains than those < or =30 years, but only for far targets. Consistent with prior reports, far targets elicited higher OCR gains than near targets, and target complexity had no effect on gains, suggesting that visual input is primarily used to maintain vergence during OCR.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19409919      PMCID: PMC5104536          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  47 in total

1.  Three-dimensional eye position during static roll and pitch in humans.

Authors:  C J Bockisch; T Haslwanter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The myth of static ocular counter-rolling: the response of the eyes to head tilt.

Authors:  Robert S Jampel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Orientation of Listing's plane during static tilt in young and older human subjects.

Authors:  Joseph M Furman; Robert H Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Vestibular sensory epithelia.

Authors:  H Engström; B Bergström; U Rosenhall
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1974-12

5.  Torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex during whole-body oscillation in the upright and the supine position. I. Responses in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  A Schmid-Priscoveanu; D Straumann; A A Kori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Atrophy of the cerebellar vermis in ageing. A morphometric and histologic study.

Authors:  A Torvik; S Torp; C F Lindboe
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings.

Authors:  H Collewijn; J Van der Steen; L Ferman; T C Jansen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effects of head and trunk position on torsional vestibular and optokinetic eye movements in humans.

Authors:  M J Morrow; J A Sharpe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The vestibular system in the elderly: clinical implications.

Authors:  P D Sloane; R W Baloh; V Honrubia
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  5 in total

1.  Static ocular counterroll reflex in skew deviation.

Authors:  M Chandrakumar; A Blakeman; H C Goltz; J A Sharpe; A M F Wong
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  New understanding on the contribution of the central otolithic system to eye movement and skew deviation.

Authors:  A M F Wong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Understanding skew deviation and a new clinical test to differentiate it from trochlear nerve palsy.

Authors:  Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Enhancing vestibular function in the elderly with imperceptible electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Jorge M Serrador; Brian M Deegan; Maria C Geraghty; Scott J Wood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of head tilt on visual field testing with a head-mounted perimeter imo.

Authors:  Sayaka Yamao; Chota Matsumoto; Hiroki Nomoto; Takuya Numata; Mariko Eura; Marika Yamashita; Shigeki Hashimoto; Sachiko Okuyama; Shinji Kimura; Kenzo Yamanaka; Yasutaka Chiba; Makoto Aihara; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.