Literature DB >> 1633410

Mechanisms underlying somatosensory cortical dynamics: II. In vitro studies.

C J Lee1, B L Whitsel, M Tommerdahl.   

Abstract

The response of the sensorimotor cortical slice to repetitive, single-site afferent drive is mapped using both evoked potential and metabolic mapping [2-deoxyglucose (2DG)] methods. Systematic changes (increases or decreases) in the evoked potential occur during repetitive 3-5 Hz stimulation. These resemble the changes in SI neuron response observed in the in vivo studies of the preceding companion article; they occur rapidly, recover within 1 min and are reproducible if stimulus parameters remain unchanged. Place, timing, and intensity of repetitive stimulation influence the amplitude and form of the response alterations observed at a given cortical locus. The neuron populations that exhibit different response modifications to the same repetitive stimulus are distributed nonrandomly in the slice: neurons occupying column-shaped aggregates undergo a common response alteration (either an increase or decrease) during repetitive stimulation, with sharp boundaries separating neighboring aggregates distinguishable on the basis of their dynamic behaviors. The distribution of stimulus-evoked 2DG uptake in the slice is "columnar," the dimensions of the 2DG columns corresponding to those mapped with neurophysiological methods. Taken together, the findings support the concept that repetitive stimulation causes the intrinsic network of somatosensory cortex to modify dynamically the network's response to extrinsic excitatory drive so that the local differences in the pattern of extrinsic excitatory drive to neighboring cortical columns are enhanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1633410     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/2.2.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  9 in total

1.  Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; Y Y Leung; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  V Tannan; S Simons; R G Dennis; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Cutaneous stimulation of the digits and lips evokes responses with different adaptation patterns in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mihai Popescu; Steven Barlow; Elena-Anda Popescu; Meredith E Estep; Lalit Venkatesan; Edward T Auer; William M Brooks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Adaptive changes in the neuromagnetic response of the primary and association somatosensory areas following repetitive tactile hand stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Elena Anda Popescu; Steven M Barlow; Lalit Venkatesan; Jingyan Wang; Mihai Popescu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  The recovery function of paired somatosensory evoked potentials in cerebral ischemic rabbits.

Authors:  Y Wang; K Nakashima; Y Shiraishi; Y Kawai; K Takahashi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Somatosensory information processing in the aging population.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Eric M Francisco; Jameson K Holden; Robert G Dennis; Mark Tommerdahl
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Effects of the N-methyl-D-Aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on vibrotactile adaptation.

Authors:  Stephen E Folger; Vinay Tannan; Zheng Zhang; Jameson K Holden; Mark Tommerdahl
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS.

Authors:  Claire J Hanley; Mark Tommerdahl; David J McGonigle
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.505

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.