BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the optimal treatment parameters for the ablation of human esophageal epithelium using a balloon-based bipolar radiofrequency (RF) energy electrode. METHODS: Immediately prior to esophagectomy, subjects underwent esophagoscopy and ablation of two separate, 3-cm long, circumferential segments of non-tumor-bearing esophageal epithelium using a balloon-based bipolar RF energy electrode (BARRX Medical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Subjects were randomized to one of three energy density groups: 8, 10, or 12 J/cm2. RF energy was applied one time (1x) proximally and two times (2x) distally. Following resection, sections from each ablation zone were evaluated using H&E and diaphorase. Histological endpoints were complete epithelial ablation (yes/no), maximum ablation depth, and residual ablation thickness after tissue slough. Outcomes were compared according to energy density group and 1x vs 2x treatment. RESULTS: Thirteen male subjects (age, 49-85 years) with esophageal adenocarcinoma underwent the ablation procedure followed by total esophagectomy. Complete epithelial removal occurred in the following zones: 10 J/cm2 (2x) and 12 J/cm2 (1x and 2x). The maximum depth of injury was the muscularis mucosae: 10 and 12 J/cm2 (both 2x). A second treatment (2x) did not significantly increase the depth of injury. Maximum thickness of residual ablation after tissue slough was only 35 microm. CONCLUSIONS: Complete removal of the esophageal epithelium without injury to the submucosa or muscularis propria is possible using this balloon-based RF electrode at 10 J/cm2 (2x) or 12 J/cm2 (1x or 2x). A second application (2x) does not significantly increase ablation depth. These data have been used to select the appropriate settings for treating intestinal metaplasia in trials currently under way.
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the optimal treatment parameters for the ablation of human esophageal epithelium using a balloon-based bipolar radiofrequency (RF) energy electrode. METHODS: Immediately prior to esophagectomy, subjects underwent esophagoscopy and ablation of two separate, 3-cm long, circumferential segments of non-tumor-bearing esophageal epithelium using a balloon-based bipolar RF energy electrode (BARRX Medical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Subjects were randomized to one of three energy density groups: 8, 10, or 12 J/cm2. RF energy was applied one time (1x) proximally and two times (2x) distally. Following resection, sections from each ablation zone were evaluated using H&E and diaphorase. Histological endpoints were complete epithelial ablation (yes/no), maximum ablation depth, and residual ablation thickness after tissue slough. Outcomes were compared according to energy density group and 1x vs 2x treatment. RESULTS: Thirteen male subjects (age, 49-85 years) with esophageal adenocarcinoma underwent the ablation procedure followed by total esophagectomy. Complete epithelial removal occurred in the following zones: 10 J/cm2 (2x) and 12 J/cm2 (1x and 2x). The maximum depth of injury was the muscularis mucosae: 10 and 12 J/cm2 (both 2x). A second treatment (2x) did not significantly increase the depth of injury. Maximum thickness of residual ablation after tissue slough was only 35 microm. CONCLUSIONS: Complete removal of the esophageal epithelium without injury to the submucosa or muscularis propria is possible using this balloon-based RF electrode at 10 J/cm2 (2x) or 12 J/cm2 (1x or 2x). A second application (2x) does not significantly increase ablation depth. These data have been used to select the appropriate settings for treating intestinal metaplasia in trials currently under way.
Authors: Robert A Ganz; David S Utley; Roger A Stern; Jerome Jackson; Kenneth P Batts; Paul Termin Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Douglas K Rex; Oscar W Cummings; Michael Shaw; Mark D Cumings; Roy K H Wong; Raj S Vasudeva; Donal Dunne; Emad Y Rahmani; Debra J Helper Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-12-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marnix Jansen; Dirk W Schölvinck; Ryoji Kushima; Shigeki Sekine; Bas L A M Weusten; Guiqi Q Wang; David E Fleischer; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Sanford M Dawsey; Sybren L Meijer; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Ichiro Oda Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Stuart Jon Spechler; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Ganapathy A Prasad; Kenneth K Wang Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Melina C Vassiliou; Daniel von Renteln; Daniel C Wiener; Stuart R Gordon; Richard I Rothstein Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 4.584