Literature DB >> 16330055

Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation.

Andrea Serino1, Valentina Angeli, Francesca Frassinetti, Elisabetta Làdavas.   

Abstract

Prism adaptation (PA) has been demonstrated to be effective in improving hemispatial neglect. However not all patients seem to benefit from this procedure. Thus, the objective of the present work is to provide behavioural and neuroanatomical predictors of recovery by exploring the reorganization of low-order visuo-motor behaviour and high-order visuo-spatial representation induced by PA. To this end, 16 neglect patients (experimental group) were submitted to a PA treatment for 10 daily sessions. Neglect and oculo-motor responses were assessed before the treatment, 1 week, 1 and 3 months after the treatment. Eight control patients, who received general cognitive stimulation, were submitted to the same tests at the same time interval. The results showed that experimental patients obtained, as a consequence of PA, a long lasting neglect recovery, a reorganization of low-order visuo-motor behaviour during and after prism exposure (error reduction and after-effect, respectively) and a leftward deviation of oculo-motor responses. Importantly, the level of error reduction obtained in the first week of treatment was predictive of neglect recovery and the amelioration of oculo-motor responses, and the degree of eye movement deviation was positively related to neglect amelioration. Finally, the study of patients' neuroanatomical data showed that severe occipital lesions were associated with a lack of error reduction, poor neglect recovery and reduced oculo-motor system amelioration. In conclusion, the present results suggest that low-order visuo-motor reorganization induced by PA promotes a resetting of the oculo-motor system leading to an improvement in high-order visuo-spatial representation able to ameliorate neglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16330055     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  37 in total

1.  Strength in numbers: combining neck vibration and prism adaptation produces additive therapeutic effects in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Styrmir Saevarsson; Arni Kristjansson; Ulrike Halsband
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Prism adaptation reverses the local processing bias in patients with right temporo-parietal junction lesions.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Robert D Rafal; Alexandra List
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation.

Authors:  I Schindler; R D McIntosh; T P Cassidy; D Birchall; V Benson; M Ietswaart; A D Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptation to Leftward Shifting Prisms Alters Motor Interhemispheric Inhibition.

Authors:  Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Selene Schintu; Alessandro Farnè; Laure Pisella; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Integrity of medial temporal structures may predict better improvement of spatial neglect with prism adaptation treatment.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Kelly M Goedert; Priyanka Shah; Anne L Foundas; A M Barrett
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Prism adaptation speeds reach initiation in the direction of the prism after-effect.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Carley A Borza
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Normative data for distal line bisection and baking tray task.

Authors:  Alessio Facchin; Nicoletta Beschin; Alessia Pisano; Cristina Reverberi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Karyn Russell; Priya Nath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Paola Fortis; Kelly M Goedert; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Adrian Kamer; Andrea M Loftus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.