Literature DB >> 20803349

Divergent evolution of molecular markers during laboratory adaptation in Drosophila subobscura.

Pedro Simões1, Marta Pascual, Maria Manuela Coelho, Margarida Matos.   

Abstract

The impact of genetic drift in population divergence can be elucidated using replicated laboratory experiments. In the present study we used microsatellite loci to study the genetic variability and differentiation of laboratory populations of Drosophila subobscura derived from a common ancestral natural population after 49 generations in the laboratory. We found substantial genetic variability in all our populations. The high levels of genetic variability, similar across replicated populations, suggest that careful maintenance procedures can efficiently reduce the loss of genetic variability in captive populations undergoing adaptation, even without applying active management procedures with conservation purposes, in organisms that generate a high number of offspring such as Drosophila. Nevertheless, there was a significant genetic differentiation between replicated populations. This shows the importance of genetic drift, acting through changes in allele frequencies among populations, even when major changes in the degree of genetic diversity in each population are not involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20803349     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-010-9486-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  37 in total

1.  Microsatellite variation in colonizing and palearctic populations of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  M Pascual; C F Aquadro; V Soto; L Serra
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Genetic variation in the spread of Drosophila subobscura from a nonequilibrium population.

Authors:  M A Noor; M Pascual; K R Smith
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The mode of evolution of molecular markers in populations of house mice under artificial selection for locomotor behavior.

Authors:  T J Morgan; T Garland; B L Irwin; J G Swallow; P A Carter
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  Convergence to a novel environment: comparative method versus experimental evolution.

Authors:  Margarida Matos; Pedro Simões; Ana Duarte; Carla Rego; Teresa Avelar; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans.

Authors:  Mark A Beaumont; David J Balding
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Molecular and quantitative genetic divergence among populations of house mice with known evolutionary histories.

Authors:  T J Morgan; M A Evans; T Garland; J G Swallow; P A Carter
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Population size changes reshape genomic patterns of diversity.

Authors:  John E Pool; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Developments in the prediction of effective population size.

Authors:  A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  The probability of losing an allele when diploid genotypes are sampled.

Authors:  H R Gregorius
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and Divergence Among Replicate Selected Drosophila Lines.

Authors:  Philippa C Griffin; Sandra B Hangartner; Alexandre Fournier-Level; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Dynamics of genetic variability in Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) during adaptation to laboratory rearing conditions.

Authors:  María A Parreño; Alejandra C Scannapieco; María I Remis; Marianela Juri; María T Vera; Diego F Segura; Jorge L Cladera; Silvia B Lanzavecchia
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Microsatellite markers from the 'South American fruit fly' Anastrepha fraterculus: a valuable tool for population genetic analysis and SIT applications.

Authors:  Silvia B Lanzavecchia; Marianela Juri; Angelica Bonomi; Ludvik Gomulski; Alejandra C Scannapieco; Diego F Segura; Anna Malacrida; Jorge L Cladera; Giuliano Gasperi
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Climate stress resistance in male Queensland fruit fly varies among populations of diverse geographic origins and changes during domestication.

Authors:  Ángel-David Popa-Báez; Siu Fai Lee; Heng Lin Yeap; Shirleen S Prasad; Michele Schiffer; Roslyn G Mourant; Cynthia Castro-Vargas; Owain R Edwards; Phillip W Taylor; John G Oakeshott
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Whole genome comparisons reveal panmixia among fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) from diverse locations.

Authors:  Katrina A Schlum; Kurt Lamour; Caroline Placidi de Bortoli; Rahul Banerjee; Robert Meagher; Eliseu Pereira; Maria Gabriela Murua; Gregory A Sword; Ashley E Tessnow; Diego Viteri Dillon; Angela M Linares Ramirez; Komivi S Akutse; Rebecca Schmidt-Jeffris; Fangneng Huang; Dominic Reisig; Scott J Emrich; Juan Luis Jurat-Fuentes
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Development of a Nasonia vitripennis outbred laboratory population for genetic analysis.

Authors:  Louis van de Zande; Steven Ferber; Ammerins de Haan; Leo W Beukeboom; Joost van Heerwaarden; Bart A Pannebakker
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  History, chance and selection during phenotypic and genomic experimental evolution: replaying the tape of life at different levels.

Authors:  Margarida Matos; Pedro Simões; Marta A Santos; Sofia G Seabra; Gonçalo S Faria; Filipa Vala; Josiane Santos; Inês Fragata
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.