BACKGROUND: Patients with dry eye syndrome are known to suffer from anxiety and depression. OBJECTIVES: Analysis of psychological disorders in therapy-resistant dry eye syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the training for interactive psychiatric screening (TRIPS) questionnaire from 110 patients with therapy-resistant dry eye syndrome was carried out. The results of the questionnaire allow the diagnosis of psychological disorders and vegetative disorders. Patients were divided into groups with anxiety, depression, mixed diagnoses, vegetative disorders and no diagnosis. A sicca score was used for assessment of dryness comprising the Schirmer test, measurement of tear meniscus, break up time, lipid layer thickness, the use of fluorescein and rose bengal staining tests and the subjective visual analogue scale. The diagnosis of dry eye syndrome was compared with the psychological disorders of anxiety and depression. RESULTS: Of the patients 52.7 % had psychological disorders with anxiety in 21.8 %, depression in 15.3 %, mixed diagnoses in 14.5 %, dystonia in 25.4 % and in 22.7 % no psychological disorders were diagnosed. General anxiety was frequent and panic disorders were often associated with other kinds of anxiety. Severe depression, such as bipolar disorder was rare. Dry eye scores were highest in the mixed group (0.59), and lowest in the group with mild anxiety (0.38). No single sicca phase disorder could be correlated with any of the psychological diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Patients with therapy-resistant dry eye syndrome often suffer from anxiety and depression. The psychological stress acts on the nervous system to suppress lacrimal gland function. Further investigation of the correlation between the lacrimal tear film phase and psychological disorders is recommended. Knowledge of personality disorders may allow psychological support that would improve the treatment options for dry eye syndrome.
BACKGROUND:Patients with dry eye syndrome are known to suffer from anxiety and depression. OBJECTIVES: Analysis of psychological disorders in therapy-resistant dry eye syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the training for interactive psychiatric screening (TRIPS) questionnaire from 110 patients with therapy-resistant dry eye syndrome was carried out. The results of the questionnaire allow the diagnosis of psychological disorders and vegetative disorders. Patients were divided into groups with anxiety, depression, mixed diagnoses, vegetative disorders and no diagnosis. A sicca score was used for assessment of dryness comprising the Schirmer test, measurement of tear meniscus, break up time, lipid layer thickness, the use of fluorescein and rose bengal staining tests and the subjective visual analogue scale. The diagnosis of dry eye syndrome was compared with the psychological disorders of anxiety and depression. RESULTS: Of the patients 52.7 % had psychological disorders with anxiety in 21.8 %, depression in 15.3 %, mixed diagnoses in 14.5 %, dystonia in 25.4 % and in 22.7 % no psychological disorders were diagnosed. General anxiety was frequent and panic disorders were often associated with other kinds of anxiety. Severe depression, such as bipolar disorder was rare. Dry eye scores were highest in the mixed group (0.59), and lowest in the group with mild anxiety (0.38). No single sicca phase disorder could be correlated with any of the psychological diagnoses. CONCLUSION:Patients with therapy-resistant dry eye syndrome often suffer from anxiety and depression. The psychological stress acts on the nervous system to suppress lacrimal gland function. Further investigation of the correlation between the lacrimal tear film phase and psychological disorders is recommended. Knowledge of personality disorders may allow psychological support that would improve the treatment options for dry eye syndrome.
Authors: Adam J Paulsen; Karen J Cruickshanks; Mary E Fischer; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Dayna S Dalton Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Magdolna Deák; Attila Szvetnik; Attila Balog; Nicolette Sohár; Renáta Varga; Gyula Pokorny; Gábor Tóth; Mária Kiss; László Kovács Journal: Neuroimmunomodulation Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 2.492
Authors: Maria B Lauvsnes; Stian S Maroni; Simone Appenzeller; Mona K Beyer; Ole J Greve; Jan T Kvaløy; Erna Harboe; Lasse G Gøransson; Anne B Tjensvoll; Roald Omdal Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2013-12
Authors: J Murube; J Németh; H Höh; P Kaynak-Hekimhan; J Horwath-Winter; A Agarwal; C Baudouin; J M Benítez del Castillo; S Cervenka; L ChenZhuo; A Ducasse; J Durán; F Holly; R Javate; J Nepp; F Paulsen; A Rahimi; P Raus; O Shalaby; P Sieg; H Soriano; D Spinelli; S H Ugurbas; G Van Setten Journal: Eur J Ophthalmol Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.922
Authors: Stephen Giacomazzi; Ivan Urits; Briggs Hoyt; Ashley Hubble; Elyse M Cornett; Kyle Gress; Karina Charipova; Amnon A Berger; Hisham Kassem; Alan D Kaye; Omar Viswanath Journal: J Patient Cent Res Rev Date: 2021-07-19
Authors: I Benjamin Condori-Meza; L Alessandra Dávila-Cabanillas; Mabel R Challapa-Mamani; Antony Pinedo-Soria; Renato R Torres; Joel Yalle; Ricardo Rojas-Humpire; Salomón Huancahuire-Vega Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-10-29