Literature DB >> 16328852

Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach. A prospective, randomized trial of Tiger II vs. Judkins catheters.

Seong-Man Kim1, Dae-Kyeong Kim, Doo-Il Kim, Dong-Soo Kim, Seung-Jae Joo, Jae-Woo Lee.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and performance of a novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for engaging both coronary arteries via the right transradial artery approach. A total of 160 patients were randomized between the standard Judkins (5F R4, L4; Cordis Corporation, Miami, FL) and the 5F Tiger II (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) catheters. End points included the duration of various procedures and the assessments of angiographic image quality and catheter performance. The Tiger II was associated with a significantly shorter (40%) total procedure time (199.6+/-50.2 vs. 331.5+/-72.9 s, p=0.001) and a 33% shorter total fluoroscopic time (93.1+/-33.8 vs. 138.2+/-47.6 s, p=0.001) for diagnostic coronary angiography, compared with those with the Judkins catheter. There was no significant difference between the Tiger II and Judkins catheters for left coronary angiographic quality (left anterior descending, 2.82+/-0.48 vs. 2.94+/-0.29, p=0.084; left circumflex, 2.90+/-0.38 vs. 2.87+/-0.44, p=0.629). The Tiger II provided superior right coronary angiograms, compared with the Judkins catheter (2.99+/- 0.11 vs. 2.82+/-0.48, p=0.003). For the left coronary angiograms, the initial randomized catheter completed the procedure in 91% of the patients with the Tiger II and in 98% with the Judkins (p=0.167) catheters. For the right coronary angiograms, 100% were completed with the Tiger II and 95% with the Judkins (p=0.120) catheters. There were no angiographic or clinical complications in either group, so the procedural success rate was 100%. The potential of the Tiger II catheter for use as a multipurpose catheter for right transradial coronary angiography to reduce procedural and X-ray times to the level of classic transfemoral coronary angiography has to be confirmed in a randomized study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328852     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-005-9029-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study).

Authors:  Yves Louvard; Hakim Benamer; Philippe Garot; David Hildick-Smith; Christophe Loubeyre; Stefano Rigattieri; Mehran Monchi; Thierry Lefèvre; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman; D Odekerken; T Slagboom; R van der Wieken
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.

Authors:  L Campeau
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1989-01

4.  Multicentre, prospective, randomized trial of 4 vs. 6 French catheters in 410 patients undergoing coronary angiography.

Authors:  D M Todd; P J Hubner; N Hudson; J Sarma; A J McCance; J Caplin
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Transradial artery Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation: results of a single-center feasibility study.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1993-10

7.  Transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.

Authors:  C Lotan; Y Hasin; M Mosseri; Y Rozenman; D Admon; H Nassar; M S Gotsman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  S L Goldberg; R Renslo; R Sinow; W J French
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1998-06

9.  Coronary angiography from the radial artery--experience, complications and limitations.

Authors:  D J Hildick-Smith; M D Lowe; J T Walsh; P F Ludman; N G Stephens; P M Schofield; D L Stone; L M Shapiro; M C Petch
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Cost comparison between two modes of Palmaz Schatz coronary stent implantation: transradial bare stent technique vs. transfemoral sheath-protected stent technique.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; J Hofland; G J Laarman; D H van der Elst; H van der Lubbe
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1995-08
View more
  9 in total

1.  Operator radiation exposure during transradial coronary angiography : Effect of single vs. double catheters.

Authors:  A Tarighatnia; L Pourafkari; A Farajollahi; A H Mohammadalian; M Ghojazadeh; N D Nader
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Mitral annulus staining during left ventriculography.

Authors:  Pilar Egea-Serrano; Roque Arana; Manuel Sancho
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Efficacy and indications of transradial and transfemoral approaches for peripheral artery stent implantation.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Huijie Li; Chunyu Zeng; Yuqiang Fang; Weibin Shi; Xiaoqun Zhang; Chengming Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Predictors of Universal Catheter Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Rebecca Liebenthal; Scott Butler; John Coppola; Binita Shah
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 2.022

5.  Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Marc Vorpahl; Till Koehler; Jason Foerst; Spyridon Panagiotopoulos; Heinrich Schleiting; Klaus Koss; Gunda Ziegler; Hilmar Brinkmann; Melchior Seyfarth; Klaus Tiroch
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 1.866

6.  Coronary Angiography Safety between Transradial and Transfemoral Access.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Sinha; Vikas Mishra; Nasar Afdaali; Mukesh Jitendra Jha; Ashutosh Kumar; Mohammad Asif; Ramesh Thakur; Chandra Mohan Varma
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  Efficacy of a one-catheter concept for transradial coronary angiography.

Authors:  Christoph Langer; Julia Riehle; Helge Wuttig; Stephanie Dürrwald; Helmut Lange; Alexander Samol; Norbert Frey; Marcus Wiemer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between the Right and Left Radial Artery Approaches from the Korean Transradial Coronary Intervention Registry.

Authors:  Ji Young Park; Seung Woon Rha; Byong Geol Choi; Dong Ju Oh; Cheol Ung Choi; Young Jin Youn; Junghan Yoon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Beading-expanded conus branch after overfilling with contrast medium.

Authors:  Shi-Wei Yang; Yu-Jie Zhou; De-An Jia; Da-Yi Hu
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.