Literature DB >> 28717826

Operator radiation exposure during transradial coronary angiography : Effect of single vs. double catheters.

A Tarighatnia1, L Pourafkari2, A Farajollahi1, A H Mohammadalian3, M Ghojazadeh4, N D Nader5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The right radial artery has gained popularity as the preferred access site for coronary angiography. To save time and limit the radiation exposure of operators and patients, newly designed catheters can be used to access both the right and left coronary arteries. The aim of this study was to compare operator radiation exposure between single-catheter (SCA) and two-catheter approaches (TCA).
METHODS: In all, 256 patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography via the right radial artery in a high-volume medical center were randomized to either the SCA or TCA group. The dose of radiation exposure of the operators was measured by an electronic dosimeter attached to the breast pocket of the operator's apron. The dose-area product and air kerma were used as indices of patient exposure to radiation. The duration of fluoroscopy "beam-on" time, acquisition time, and total duration of the procedure were measured and analyzed for the two groups.
RESULTS: Operator radiation exposure was 21.6 ± 11.4 µSv in the SCA group, which was significantly less than 28.0 ± 14.9 µSv in the TCA group. The duration of fluoroscopy was significantly shorter in the SCA group than in the TCA group (152 ± 83 vs. 203 ± 121 s; p < 0.001). Moreover, the total duration of the diagnostic procedure was also shorter in the SCA group compared with the TCA group (9.5 ± 3.2 vs. 11.4 ± 4.0 min; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The use of SCA is advantageous over TCA in reducing the exposure of operators to radiation. The shorter duration of fluoroscopy beam-on time and total procedure time may contribute to the lower exposure of operators to radiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheterization; Coronary angiography; Fluoroscopy; Radial artery; Radiation exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28717826     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-017-4595-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  28 in total

Review 1.  Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Plourde; Samir B Pancholy; Jim Nolan; Sanjit Jolly; Sunil V Rao; Imdad Amhed; Sripal Bangalore; Tejas Patel; Johannes B Dahm; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach. A prospective, randomized trial of Tiger II vs. Judkins catheters.

Authors:  Seong-Man Kim; Dae-Kyeong Kim; Doo-Il Kim; Dong-Soo Kim; Seung-Jae Joo; Jae-Woo Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Left radial access for percutaneous coronary procedures: from neglected to performer? A meta-analysis of 14 studies including 7,603 procedures.

Authors:  Salvatore De Rosa; Daniele Torella; Gianluca Caiazzo; Salvatore Giampà; Ciro Indolfi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 4.  A review of radiation exposures associated with radial cardiac catheterisation.

Authors:  Eugene Y Park; Adhir R Shroff; L Van-Thomas Crisco; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.534

5.  Impact of an extension tube on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures performed through the radial approach.

Authors:  Nicolas Marque; Arnaud Jégou; Olivier Varenne; Emmanuel Salengro; Philippe Allouch; Olivier Margot; Christian Spaulding
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 2.340

Review 6.  Clinical update: Remaining challenges and opportunities for improvement in percutaneous transradial coronary procedures.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Ivo Bernat; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciahbasi; Enrico Romagnoli; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Alessandro Sarandrea; Francesco Summaria; Gianluca Pendenza; Antonella Tommasino; Roberto Patrizi; Mario Mazzari; Rocco Mongiardo; Ernesto Lioy
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access.

Authors:  Helmut W Lange; Heiner von Boetticher
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Reduction in operator radiation exposure during transradial catheterization and intervention using a simple lead drape.

Authors:  Ali F Iqtidar; Cathy Jeon; Richard Rothman; Randall Snead; Christopher T Pyne
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 10.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Martha S Linet; Deukwoo Kwon; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.