Literature DB >> 16327452

An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images.

Albert Losken1, Inessa Fishman, Donald D Denson, Hunter R Moyer, Grant W Carlson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The concept of natural breast asymmetry is well known; however, actual documentation in the literature is limited. New technology is currently available which provides 3-dimensional surface images of the breast and the ability to qualitatively determine differences in breast size, shape, and contour. The purpose of this report is to objectively determine the extent to which this natural breast asymmetry exists.
METHODS: Eighty-seven women without a history of breast cancer or previous breast surgery were included. Images were obtained using 3dMD technology. Data points queried included age, parity, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, and bra size. Left/right images were superimposed and the distance between the 2 surfaces, and contour was calculated. The degree of asymmetry was determined and comparisons were made. Similar differences in nipple-to-notch measurements were calculated and compared. Subjective evaluations were included for clinical relevance.
RESULTS: The average age was 49.6 years (range: 19-77), with an average BMI of 25 (range: 18.5-36.7). The average nipple to notch on the left was 24.3 cm and 23.8 cm on the right. The nipple-to-notch asymmetry was on average 3.2%, with the left breast measurement being greater the majority of the time (62%). The mean distance between each breast demonstrated consistent breast asymmetry, with an average measurement of +0.5 mm (left breast being larger than the right). The degree of breast asymmetry was documented by a root mean square value (RMS) of 5.93 mm. This was not related to age, parity, or ethnicity; however, it was significantly higher in those patients with larger BMI, cup size, and chest-wall circumference. Only 10% of women were found to have severe breast asymmetry on subjective evaluation, which correlated objectively with the RMS in that group being significantly higher at 9.8 mm (P < 0.05). There were no predictable patterns of asymmetry; however, the most common pattern was larger laterally and smaller medially, found in 32% of the women.
CONCLUSION: Natural breast asymmetry does exist, demonstrated objectively using 3-dimensional surfaces images. The left breast is on average larger than the right, with differences in size and shape being consistent but fairly unpredictable. It is important that we know baseline differences in breast symmetry prior to objectively analyzing results following esthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16327452     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000185459.49434.5f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  19 in total

1.  A novel quantitative measure of breast curvature based on catenary.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Si Chen; Gregory P Reece; Melissa A Crosby; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  MRI-based breast volumetry-evaluation of three different software solutions.

Authors:  Christian Herold; A Reichelt; L H Stieglitz; S Dettmer; K Knobloch; J Lotz; P M Vogt
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen; Robert T Spychal; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

4.  Asymmetric development of the male mouse mammary gland and its response to a prenatal or postnatal estrogen challenge.

Authors:  Aastha Pokharel; SriDurgaDevi Kolla; Klara Matouskova; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  Reliability, validity, and precision of an active stereophotogrammetry system for three-dimensional evaluation of the human torso.

Authors:  Scott M Paul; Andrew P Chamberlin; Charles Hatt; Amritha V Nayak; Jerome V Danoff
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  The 3D Facial Norms Database: Part 1. A Web-Based Craniofacial Anthropometric and Image Repository for the Clinical and Research Community.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Zachary D Raffensperger; Matthew J Kesterke; Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Jacqueline T Hecht; Chung How Kau; Jeffrey C Murray; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2015-10-22

7.  Enhancing breast projection in autologous reconstruction using the St Andrew's coning technique and 3D volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen; Nakul Gamanlal Patel; David J Hunter-Smith; Venkat Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

8.  Validation of stereophotogrammetry of the human torso.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Manas Kawale; Fatima A Merchant; June Weston; Michelle C Fingeret; Dianne Ladewig; Gregory P Reece; Melissa A Crosby; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2011-02-15

9.  Weight versus volume in breast surgery: an observational study.

Authors:  Chetan Parmar; Malcolm West; Samir Pathak; J Nelson; Lee Martin
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-11-15

10.  Ethnic and age differences in right-left breast asymmetry in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Rachel Denholm; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.