Literature DB >> 16325622

Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh.

Giti Bensinger1, Larry Lind, Martin Lesser, Marsha Guess, Harvey A Winkler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the complication rates of abdominal sacral suspensions (ASC) using polypropylene mesh and to compare the erosion rates in women who underwent ASC at the time of supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) versus ASC in women who had previously undergone TAH. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients from the urogynecology practice at North Shore University Hospital, who underwent ASC with polypropylene mesh between March 1997 and July 2004. Office and hospital charts were reviewed for patient demographics, preoperative history and physical examinations, intraoperative and postoperative findings, and complications. Women were stratified into 3 groups: group I: SCH with ASC; group II: TAH with ASC; and group III: ASC alone in women with a history of prior TAH.
RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were analyzed and comprised group I, 30.6% (n = 37); group II, 40.5% (n = 49); and group III, 28.9% (n = 35). Four patients (3.3%) had mesh erosions develop. There were no significant differences in age, weight, parity, menopause status, estrogen therapy, previous surgery, or degree of preoperative prolapse between the patients with and without erosions. All the erosions occurred in group II (8.2%, 95% CI (2.3%-19.6%, P = .0389). The intraoperative complication rate was 2.5% and included a cystotomy (n = 2) and a small bowel laceration (n = 1). Immediate postoperative complications included partial SBO/ Ileus (3.5%), febrile morbidity (9.6%), and autologous blood transfusions (1.7%). Long-term complications included persistent vaginal discharge (4.7%), vaginal bleeding (1.6%), dysparuenia (6.3%), and recurrent prolapse (2.5%). There were no significant differences in short- or long-term complications among the 3 groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: ASC with polypropylene mesh is a safe surgical procedure for vaginal vault prolapse with low complication rates. Mesh erosion occurred in 8.2% of patients who underwent TAH with concurrent ASC. Patients having ASC at the time of TAH had a 7-fold increased risk for mesh erosion compared with patients who underwent SCH with ASC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16325622     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  19 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Xueli Jia; Cathryn Glazener; Graham Mowatt; David Jenkinson; Cynthia Fraser; Christine Bain; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.

Authors:  Estelle Jeanditgautier; Olivier Mayeur; Mathias Brieu; Gery Lamblin; Chrystele Rubod; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Risk factors for mesh erosion 3 months following vaginal reconstructive surgery using commercial kits vs. fashioned mesh-augmented vaginal repairs.

Authors:  Peter S Finamore; Karolynn T Echols; Krystal Hunter; Howard B Goldstein; Adam S Holzberg; Babak Vakili
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Sacral colpopexy: long-term mesh complications requiring reoperation(s).

Authors:  Emmanuelle Arsene; Géraldine Giraudet; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Chrystèle Rubod; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Vaginal Vault Suspension at Hysterectomy for Prolapse - Myths and Facts, Anatomical Requirements, Fixation Techniques, Documentation and Cost Accounting.

Authors:  F Graefe; J Marschke; T Dimpfl; R Tunn
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 8.  Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Takacs; Karl J Kreder
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Pyogenic spondylodiscitis associated with sacral colpopexy and rectopexy: report of two cases and evaluation of the literature.

Authors:  Katie Propst; Elena Tunitsky-Bitton; Megan O Schimpf; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.