Literature DB >> 16325362

Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.

Itiel E Dror1, David Charlton, Ailsa E Péron.   

Abstract

We investigated whether experts can objectively focus on feature information in fingerprints without being misled by extraneous information, such as context. We took fingerprints that have previously been examined and assessed by latent print experts to make positive identification of suspects. Then we presented these same fingerprints again, to the same experts, but gave a context that suggested that they were a no-match, and hence the suspects could not be identified. Within this new context, most of the fingerprint experts made different judgements, thus contradicting their own previous identification decisions. Cognitive aspects involved in biometric identification can explain why experts are vulnerable to make erroneous identifications.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16325362     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  25 in total

1.  The vision in "blind" justice: expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition.

Authors:  Itiel E Dror; Simon A Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Fingerprint identification: advances since the 2009 National Research Council report.

Authors:  Christophe Champod
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element.

Authors:  Itiel E Dror
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The perceived credibility of repeated-event witnesses depends upon their veracity.

Authors:  Sarah L Deck; Helen M Paterson
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2021-09-29

5.  Context modulates the contribution of time and space in causal inference.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Matthew Lehet; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-01

6.  Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.

Authors:  Bradford T Ulery; R Austin Hicklin; JoAnn Buscaglia; Maria Antonia Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The National DNA Data Bank of Canada: a Quebecer perspective.

Authors:  Emmanuel Milot; Marie M J Lecomte; Hugo Germain; Frank Crispino
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.

Authors:  Philip J Kellman; Jennifer L Mnookin; Gennady Erlikhman; Patrick Garrigan; Tandra Ghose; Everett Mettler; David Charlton; Itiel E Dror
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: experts can do a lot with a little.

Authors:  Matthew B Thompson; Jason M Tangen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.

Authors:  Frederick R Bieber; John S Buckleton; Bruce Budowle; John M Butler; Michael D Coble
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.