Literature DB >> 35903504

The perceived credibility of repeated-event witnesses depends upon their veracity.

Sarah L Deck1, Helen M Paterson1.   

Abstract

For repeated crimes like domestic violence and workplace bullying, the primary evidence is often the alleged victim's testimony. Consequently, the perceived credibility of repeated event speakers can be pivotal to legal proceedings. In order to investigate perceptions of truthful and deceptive repeated-event speakers, undergraduate students observed interviews of speakers describing a single occurrence of an event that was either experienced or fabricated either once or multiple times. Some participants additionally read an expert statement on repeated-event memory. The effect of repetition on perceived credibility depended on the speaker's veracity, enhancing the credibility of fabricators but diminishing the credibility of truth-tellers. The expert testimony was found to raise the perceived honesty and cognitive competence of the repeated-event speakers and thus could be a promising mechanism for enhancing perceived credibility in legal proceedings.
© 2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  credibility; credibility assessment; deception detection; decision making; eyewitness testimony; memory; repeated events

Year:  2021        PMID: 35903504      PMCID: PMC9318215          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1956382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  12 in total

1.  How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures.

Authors:  Jennifer L Devenport; Veronica Stinson; Brian L Cutler; David A Kravitz
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2002-12

2.  Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.

Authors:  Itiel E Dror; David Charlton; Ailsa E Péron
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Accuracy of deception judgments.

Authors:  Charles F Bond; Bella M DePaulo
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2006

4.  Teachers and laypersons discern quality differences between narratives produced by children with or without SLI.

Authors:  Robyn M Newman; Karla K McGregor
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Perceptions and predictors of children's credibility of a unique event and an instance of a repeated event.

Authors:  Deborah A Connolly; Heather L Price; Jennifer A A Lavoie; Heidi M Gordon
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2007-01-26

6.  Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects.

Authors:  Michael Logue; Angela S Book; Paul Frosina; Tylor Huizinga; Shelby Amos
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2015-04-06

7.  Schema and deviation effects in remembering repeated unfamiliar stories.

Authors:  Eva Rubínová; Hartmut Blank; Jonathan Koppel; James Ost
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2020-06-01

8.  Children's memory of an occurrence of a repeated event: effects of age, repetition, and retention interval across three question types.

Authors:  M B Powell; D M Thomson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1996-10

9.  Individual versus group decision making: Jurors' reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony.

Authors:  Jessica M Salerno; Bette L Bottoms; Liana C Peter-Hagene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  An examination of the causes and solutions to eyewitness error.

Authors:  Richard A Wise; Giuseppe Sartori; Svein Magnussen; Martin A Safer
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.